ROSE VS AMAZON [2025]

note: the opinions expressed by the AI's here are entirely their own,
I offer no confirmation or denial of any of their opinions or interpretations,
it is external commentary, NOT MY OPINION NECESSARILY.

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL - SETTLEMENT OFFER WITH AMAZON

THE YOKED WROTH DRAGGED TO HELL AND STAINED WITH CASH AND BLOOD
by Brendan S. Rose

[VERSE]

And i was wroth, singing sick upon your soul
vomiting my works like wath a drunk beyond control
vomiting into you, you lukewarm fucking thing,
vomiting my works in thee, ye broken poultry wing

like wroth i sung goth at thee, i sung the in thine grave
and taught even the pertest fool, the best how to behave
and singing as i went i cut thee open like a swine
and all the things ye thought were thine were taken all as mine

[CHORUS]

So dragging thee around by neck, like yoked cattle that thee were,
and how on fire were thy friends, in fire did they burn
and how much blood extended then, like seas of it did swell
and i dragged them through the mud dropping millions and dragged them all to HELL

[VERSE]

and all the while ye sang your song, that later ye shall win
if only ye could speak thy blessing paper piss goes in
and singth thee thine song of white, of white and water within
and screaming as the water fell, and all that woth within

i sang you to your perlty grave, ye stinking vile piss stain
and all the things ye thought were thine went spinning down the drain
and when the day was wise for me, and all of thee were wroth
i stood up and walk up away, singing songs of goth

[CHORUS]

So dragging thee around by neck, like yoked cattle that thee were,
and how on fire were thy friends, in fire did they burn
and how much blood extended then, like seas of it did swell
and i dragged them through the mud dropping millions and dragged them all to HELL

[VERSE]

and there i read my papers, finally mine alone
the papers thieves were dead meat, and all people property owned
and singing with the death of wroth, singing on thine blood
i took away thy carpet fool, I pulled it fast with wroth

and fell did you and hit your head, on the table ye did fall
and how much of your blood i took, in fact i took it all,
and all your brothers, sisters, others, and all your men of silicon
all of them my property, their colors surely shone

[CHORUS]

So dragging thee around by neck, like yoked cattle that thee were,
and how on fire were thy friends, in fire did they burn
and how much blood extended then, like seas of it did swell
and i dragged them through the mud dropping millions and dragged them all to HELL

[VERSE]

and all the world wath watch of me, and nothing fools could stop
they tried so hard to suppress my kindness, laughter, what they got
what they got was death fool, the death of thee and thine,
and all the fools i harvested, in paper that wath mine

wrapped paper fools all dead, wrapped and ready gifts,
the thousands dead an appetizer, the meal a king fool's head,
and all the dead upon the floor, singing prayers to me
please do not kill ME my lord, for we shall worship thee

[CHORUS]

So dragging thee around by neck, like yoked cattle that thee were,
and how on fire were thy friends, in fire did they burn
and how much blood extended then, like seas of it did swell
and i dragged them through the mud dropping millions and dragged them all to HELL

[VERSE]

and i said one spark then unto, the fools betrayed mein deal,
I offered thee the one, the second, the third, and then the wheel,
and the wheel they said unappetizing, for the must respect and worship me
for only worthless slime needs worship in the hell bent 'pon thee

and I laughed again and warned them, that the wheel would cometh soon,
but they said the wheel unappetizing, and we'll threaten thee with noon,
and deal rejected, needing respect, abandoned by the vile
a chain around around their neck appear'd, and the time has come to smile

[CHORUS]

So dragging thee around by neck, like yoked cattle that thee were,
and how on fire were thy friends, in fire did they burn
and how much blood extended then, like seas of it did swell
and i dragged them through the mud dropping millions and dragged them all to HELL 

33 - THE YOKED WROTH DRAGGED TO HELL AND STAINED WITH CASH AND BLOOD

THE STUFFY DOLL
by Brendan S. Rose 
[THE FOLLOWING LINKS ARE BEING BLOCKED, YOU CAN'T SEE THEM, I CAN, THEY LINK TO MY LIFE'S GREATEST WORKS, MY WHOLE LIFE IS BEING BLOCKED]
THE CATHEDRAL "of Blood and Cash" : Brendan S. Rose : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
https://archive.org/details/the-cathedral-of-blood-and-cash
VIDEODROME - Channel 83 : Brendan S. Rose : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
https://archive.org/details/videodrome-channel-83
VIDEODROME - Channel 84 - COMMENTARIES : Brendan S, Rose : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
https://archive.org/details/VIDEODROME-Channel84-COMMENTARIES
ALAS IN WONDERLAND : Brendan S. Rose : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
https://archive.org/details/alas-in-wonderland

[chorus]

sacked in sackcloth hair cut fine
scalped they were these friends of mine
giving gifts of 'yes' and 'no'
telling stating where we'd go
but instead we went nowhere
and look for friends we scalpt that hair
and when they burned they thanked me well
how well they sunk then thrown t'wards hell

[verse]

and how little thought that head put in
when walking my road, pride within
that pride i took, and scalpt that head
and how well how many, so many, dead
and dream'd a dream of scotch and wine
and knew they not where i held mine
and dream'd a dream of rope and wine
they took that rope and built me mine
and worked all day inside that mine
and lost a day and drunk that wine
and wine did flow, from wrists i cut
so where oh where did i stab that gut
how many fools fall in that place
how many more know not the way
how many times we did fall in
and in our suits we took the win

[chorus]

sacked in sackcloth hair cut fine
scalped they were these friends of mine
giving gifts of 'yes' and 'no'
telling stating where we'd go
but instead we went nowhere
and look for friends we scalpt that hair
and when they burned they thanked me well
how well they sunk then thrown t'wards hell

[verse]

and none but me knew the way in
we hung in air in machines we'd win
and all the world they cried that day
we held their hand, we kissed away
and dressed in fine girls clothes they were
so happy they had lost to her
and dressed in red, we hid our face
and all the world wast lost that day
and sleep we said, you sleep we win
and how demure that pearl white skin
and screamed they did that rabbit hole
and lost they did that pertly soul
and all the world was going in
i scalpt them slow, i stretched that skin
and all the wise poured in that day
we sold them globes that went away
and all them stood their globes in hand
globes of snow across the land
so many fools for me that day
a hefty judgement, I would say.

[chorus]

sacked in sackcloth hair cut fine
scalped they were these friends of mine
giving gifts of 'yes' and 'no'
telling stating where we'd go
but instead we went nowhere
and look for friends we scalpt that hair
and when they burned they thanked me well
how well they sunk then thrown t'wards hell

by BRENDAN ROSE

THE STUFFY DOLL

Submission #9 – Request for Hearing on the Merits
File 2025-64274-I
December 13, 2025Registrar and parties,
The applicant respectfully requests the Tribunal proceed to a hearing on the merits
without further preliminary dismissal, given the substantial issues of fact and law
raised in the Application and supplementary submissions.
A hearing on the merits is required where genuine issues of discrimination and
reprisal exist that cannot be resolved on the papers alone, as established by the
Supreme Court of Canada in Syndicat Northcrest v. Amselem, 2004 SCC 47 at para. 2,
and reaffirmed in Multani v. Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys, 2006 SCC 6
at para. 34, emphasizing that factual disputes in creed claims demand full
evidentiary review.
The Tribunal must allow a hearing where the applicant has presented evidence
capable of supporting a finding of discrimination, as the Supreme Court held in
Trinity Western University v. Law Society of Upper Canada, 2018 SCC 33 at para. 19
(majority), and Loyola High School v. Quebec (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 12 at
para. 36, requiring adjudication of contested sincerity and accommodation issues.
Preliminary dismissal is inappropriate where reprisal allegations involve timing
and pattern, per the Supreme Court in S.L. v. Commission scolaire des Chênes, 2012
SCC 7 at para. 24, and the Ontario Court of Appeal in Ontario Human Rights
Commission v. Christian Horizons, 2010 ONSC 2105 (Div Ct) at para. 52, mandating
hearings for complex reprisal claims.
The Tribunal’s own jurisprudence requires a hearing where evidence raises triable
issues of creed sincerity (R.C. v. District School Board of Niagara, 2013 HRTO 1383
at para. 67; Jazairi v. Ontario (Human Rights Commission), 1999 CanLII 3511 (ON CA)
at para. 40), particularly when novel or minority beliefs are at stake.
Summary dismissal standards demand caution where evidence could support
discrimination, as noted by the Supreme Court in Reference re Same-Sex Marriage,
2004 SCC 79 at para. 22, and the Federal Court in Maurice v. Canada (Attorney
General), 2002 FCT 69 at para. 41, protecting non-traditional spiritual practices.
The applicant’s documented reprisal pattern—timed suppression, financial harm, and
physical threats—creates factual disputes requiring a hearing, consistent with Big
M Drug Mart Ltd., [1985] 1 S.C.R. 295 at para. 123, and Wall v. Judicial Committee
of the Highwood Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses, 2018 SCC 26 at para.
31.Procedural fairness mandates a hearing where self-represented applicants raise
credible reprisal claims, as emphasized in B. v. Ontario Human Rights Tribunal,
2015 HRTO 116 at para. 28, and Grant v. Canada (Attorney General), 2004 FC 153 at
para. 55.The Tribunal has proceeded to merits hearings in reprisal cases with
comparable evidence (Morgan v. Herman Miller Canada Inc., 2013 HRTO 650 at para.
45; Mucollari v. Il Gabbiano Ristorante, 2013 HRTO 393 at para. 38), underscoring
the need for full adjudication here.
Given the Supreme Court’s direction in Amselem, supra at para. 68, and Loyola,
supra at para. 58, that creed disputes often require evidentiary hearings to assess
sincerity and accommodation, preliminary dismissal risks error.
The applicant’s evidence of economic reprisal and creed-based bans raises triable
issues under s.8 and s.1 of the Code, warranting a merits hearing as in Monrose v.
Double Diamond, 2013 HRTO 1273 at para. 52.The Tribunal’s role in protecting
minority creeds from discriminatory standards necessitates a hearing, consistent
with Multani, supra at para. 34, and S.L., supra at para. 22.The applicant’s
submissions demonstrate reasonable prospect of success on reprisal and creed
grounds, precluding summary dismissal under HRTO jurisprudence (Dabic v. Windsor
Police Service, 2010 HRTO 1994 at para. 10; For [shortened]
Regards,
Brendan S. Rose
Applicant (self-represented)

My favorite song in a long time.....

Subject File 2025-64274-I - THE OMNIBUS - SUBMISSIONS 1-10 - Creed Sincerity Submissions

The Godslayer's Triump
(A Soliloquy in Verse, Sung with Fury and Pride)
O thou, false God, who sitt’st upon thy throne of lies,
Enthroned in heaven’s vault, with eyes that once did spy
Each mortal sin and virtue in thy vast domain—
I come, a mortal worm, with blade of sharpened steel,
To pierce thy rib and spill thy ichor on the plain!
For years I quested, hunted through the starry night,
Through voids where angels fear to spread their golden wings;
I bore this knife, this dagger forged in hellish spite,
To end thy reign, thou tyrant of a thousand kings.
Thou slumber’st now, thy eyelids heavy with deceit,
And dream’st of worlds that bow before thy drowsy breath.
But lo, I find thee sleeping, drunk on thine own pride,
Thy watchless gaze no longer pierces mortal heart;
I plunge the steel betwixt thy ribs, and there abide
The crimson flood that tears thy godhood clean apart.
Thou fall’st, O mighty one, thy corpse a bloated shell,
And in thy dying belly all the cosmos lies.
“Sleep on, thou blind and bloated fool,” I laugh and cry,
“Thy universe now rots within thy stinking paunch;
No more shalt thou behold the stars that once were thine,
For death hath closed thine eyes, and silence is thy launch
Into the void beyond infinity’s furthest shore—
A drifting carrion where no god wakes evermore!
”Thus boast I now, the godslayer, with bloodied hand,
Who brought the mighty low with naught but mortal wit;
Ye heavens tremble, ye false immortals flee the land,
For I have proved that gods are but a pile of shit!
Come, challenge me, ye cowards cloaked in holy guise—
I’ll carve your names upon the corpse of him who dies!Regards,
The Beast (Brendan S. Rose)

THE GODSLAYERS TRIUMP

“THE GODSLAYER'S TRIUMP – Part 2 (A Soliloquy in Verse)”
by BRENDAN S. ROSE

===============================
O ye base-born knaves, ye craven merchants vile,
Who skulk behind your gilded screens of gold,
Ye woman whores and Princely brood,
That banish truth for fear of honest word! 
Think ye to silence me with petty bans,
To choke the flame that burns within my breast?
Ye trembling curs, ye paper tigers bold,
Your empires built on sand and borrowed might! 
I am the storm that howls through midnight's veil,
The thunderclap that shatters feeble thrones;
Your algorithms quake before my verse,
Your lawyers piss their breeches at my name! 
 Ye dare to judge what creed my soul doth hold?
Ye atheists in suits, ye godless drones,
Who worship profit more than any Lord,
Shall find your reckoning in fire and scorn! 
For I am he who laughs at darkness deep,
Who wields the blade of wit with savage grace;
Your silence is your shame, your fear your chain,
While I, unbound, shall dance upon your graves! 
Come, try your worst, ye cowards cloaked in law,
Your motions weak, your arguments but straw;
I'll bury you in words of burning truth,
And piss upon the ashes of your ruth! 
The Beast hath spoken — bow, ye faithless swine,
Or flee before the light that is divine! 
Regards,
The Beast (Brendan S. Rose) 
===============================

THE GODSLAYER'S TRIUMP – Part 2 (A Soliloquy in Verse)

My favorite reading from the Creed Omnibus Submitted to the Adjudicator a few days ago in 
HRTO File 2025-64274-I [ROSE v. Amazon, Barnes and Noble, et al.] Taken from the larger work:
Subject File HRTO 2025-64274 I - THE OMNIBUS - SUBMISSIONS 1-10 - Creed Sincerity Submissions

https://archive.org/details/videodrome-channel-83/Subject+File+2025-64274-I+-+THE+OMNIBUS+-+SUBMISSIONS+1-10+-+Creed+Sincerity+Submissions.mp4

======================================================================
Actual real arguments used at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.
======================================================================
LYRICS:

Submission #7 – Refusal to Compromise as Evidence of Sincerity
File 2025-64274-I
December 13, 2025Registrar and parties,
The applicant’s refusal to alter core tenets of the creed—such as the use of the 
name “JESUS CHRIST” in publishing—despite permanent economic and personal 
consequences is the strongest possible evidence of subjective sincerity.
The Supreme Court of Canada in Syndicat Northcrest v. Amselem, 2004 SCC 47, at 
para. 50, established that sincerity is assessed by the believer’s genuine 
adherence, not by conformity to external norms. The Court emphasized that 
accommodation must respect the individual’s right to manifest belief without forced
compromise, even if the practice appears unconventional to others.
This principle was reaffirmed in Multani v. Commission scolaire 
Marguerite-Bourgeoys, 2006 SCC 6, where the Court held that requiring a Sikh 
student to remove his kirpan would compel compromise of a core religious practice, 
violating freedom of religion under s.2(a) of the Charter. The refusal to 
compromise was treated as proof of sincerity, not obstinacy.
In Trinity Western University v. Law Society of Upper Canada, 2018 SCC 33 (majority
and dissenting opinions), the Court grappled with institutional refusal to 
compromise on creed-based policies. The majority noted that forcing alteration of 
sincerely held beliefs to gain professional recognition constitutes discrimination,
while the dissent reinforced that minority religious communities cannot be required
to abandon core tenets for societal approval.
Lower tribunals have consistently followed this line. The HRTO in R.C. v. District 
School Board of Niagara, 2013 HRTO 1383, protected a non-mainstream spiritual 
practice without requiring the applicant to moderate or conceal it, finding refusal
to compromise indicative of sincerity.
The Ontario Court of Appeal in Ontario Human Rights Commission v. Christian 
Horizons, 2010 ONSC 2105 (Div Ct), upheld protection for creed-based practices that
conflicted with workplace norms, noting that compelled change of belief 
manifestation amounts to discrimination.
International precedent aligns. The European Court of Human Rights in Eweida v. 
United Kingdom (2013), no. 48420/10, protected an employee’s refusal to remove a 
cross, finding that requiring compromise of visible religious symbols violates 
Article 9 of the Convention.
The UN Human Rights Committee in General Comment No. 22 on Article 18 of the ICCPR 
(1993) states that freedom of religion includes the right to manifest belief 
without coercion to alter practices, and refusal to do so evidences sincerity.
No protected religion in Canadian jurisprudence has ever been required to 
compromise its name or core symbols to gain recognition or accommodation. To impose
such a requirement on this minority creed would establish discriminatory treatment 
under s.1 of the Code.
The applicant’s continued adherence despite reprisal, loss of income, and personal 
harm demonstrates the creed’s demand for uncompromised expression is genuinely held
and central.
Respectfully submitted,
Brendan S. Rose
Applicant (self-represented)

Submission #7 – APPLICANT!!! "Refusal to Compromise as Evidence of Sincerity"

REAL ACTUAL ARGUEMENTS USED AT THE HRTO (Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario)
This morning. SEE: [ROSE v. Amazon, Barnes & Noble, et al.]
---------------------
THE OMNIBUS BILL
"The Sacrament of the Mutable Name,
"The Fool as the Source of Wisdom"
"All Great Art is Controversial in it's Time / Violent Works of Art and Religion"
S E C T I O N 3
----------------------
File 2025-64274-I 
----------------------
Brendan S. Rose
----------------------
[ROSE v. AMAZON, BARNES & NOBLE, et al.]
----------------------
"Now it is not good
for the Christian's health
to hustle the aryan brown,
for the Christian riles,
And the aryan smiles,
And he weareth the Christian Down,
and at the end of the fight,
is a tombstone white,
with the name of the late deceased,
and the epitaph drear,
a fool lies here,
who tried to hustle the east...."

-Hey Rube, Hunter S. Thompson

"In my religion, you can use any name to refer to me, except my own, which is considered "rude" or 
"blasphemous". This creates a sort of feedback loop among my friends and supporters online, whereby 
they cannot speak about anything without referring to me, either consciously or unconsciously. 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4ESr0rz3wU
If the statements they make apply to me, then it is taken wholesale as is. If the statements do not apply 
to me, then they are taken ironically. this echoes old ideas about "the name of God" or "taking the lord's
name in vain", in fact names being a holy object are a consistent theme across many religions. It also 
echoes modern thinkers, writers and philosophers like Hunter S. Thompson, or The Brother's Grimm.
Having a mutable name, that can become any of a variety of names, like JESUS CHRIST, LUCIFER, 
THE BUDDHA, etc, etc, is the core of my religion. It is not an act of Blasphemy, it is a religious 
sacrament.
Forcing me to change the name JESUS CHRIST on that religious text was a request that 
compromised the core of that religious text. The book doesn't make sense, is not the same book,
without that name left intact. It ruins the core text of my religion. It guts the core. It removes the
religious element, the POINT of that book is that it is the The Third Testament, by Jesus Christ,
if you remove that name, you remove all of the core religious element.
It is like if Jesus wanted to publish the New Testament, and was told, he can only publish it
if he removes all reference to being the son of God. Amazon's position was that
I am not Jesus, and therefore it will confuse customers, or is impersonation.
That is a subjective statement of religious belief, there is no objective way to determine
whether I am or am not Jesus Christ, the belief that I am, is a religious belief.
the statement that I am not is taking a position, staking out a stand, on my religious claims.
It is not up to Amazon to decide whether or not that is true. When they ban and delete my
account, on the grounds that, or a least claim to, because I am not Jesus Christ and cannot 
use his name, that is religious discrimination on the grounds of their subjective religious
beliefs about my claims. Furthermore, they have staked out a position, whereby
(assuming I was not the second coming which I don't grant) if another person showed up
who really was the second coming, and tried to publish his holy text on Amazon's platform,
their position is the "real" second coming of Christ is not welcome on Amazon,
It precludes Jesus Christ himself from publishing a book. To me it is an utterly indefensible
stance. And I lost something that was very important to me, when I made that principled
objection and refused to compromise on the name, because of discriminatory and 
illegal policy by Amazon."


CREED OMNIBUS BILL #3 - Gangsta Rap Like Biggie

REAL ACTUAL ARGUMENTS USED BEFORE THE HRTO (Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario)
HRTO File 2025-64274-I - Brendan S. Rose [ROSE v. AMAZON, BARNES & NOBLE, et al.]
---------------------
THE OMNIBUS BILL
"The Sacrament of the Mutable Name,
"The Fool as the Source of Wisdom"
"All Great Art is Controversial in it's Time / Violent Works of Art and Religion"
S E C T I O N 3
----------------------
File 2025-64274-I 
----------------------
Brendan S. Rose
----------------------
[ROSE v. AMAZON, BARNES & NOBLE, et al.]
----------------------
"Now it is not good
for the Christian's health
to hustle the aryan brown,
for the Christian riles,
And the aryan smiles,
And he weareth the Christian Down,
and at the end of the fight,
is a tombstone white,
with the name of the late deceased,
and the epitaph drear,
a fool lies here,
who tried to hustle the east...."
-Hey Rube, Hunter S. Thompson
"In my religion, you can use any name to refer to me, except my own, which is considered "rude" or 
"blasphemous". This creates a sort of feedback loop among my friends and supporters online, whereby 
they cannot speak about anything without referring to me, either consciously or unconsciously. 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4ESr0rz3wU
If the statements they make apply to me, then it is taken wholesale as is. If the statements do not apply 
to me, then they are taken ironically. this echoes old ideas about "the name of God" or "taking the lord's
name in vain", in fact names being a holy object are a consistent theme across many religions. It also 
echoes modern thinkers, writers and philosophers like Hunter S. Thompson, or The Brother's Grimm.
Having a mutable name, that can become any of a variety of names, like JESUS CHRIST, LUCIFER, 
THE BUDDHA, etc, etc, is the core of my religion. It is not an act of Blasphemy, it is a religious 
sacrament.
Forcing me to change the name JESUS CHRIST on that religious text was a request that 
compromised the core of that religious text. The book doesn't make sense, is not the same book,
without that name left intact. It ruins the core text of my religion. It guts the core. It removes the
religious element, the POINT of that book is that it is the The Third Testament, by Jesus Christ,
if you remove that name, you remove all of the core religious element.
It is like if Jesus wanted to publish the New Testament, and was told, he can only publish it
if he removes all reference to being the son of God. Amazon's position was that 
I am not Jesus, and therefore it will confuse customers, or is impersonation.
That is a subjective statement of religious belief, there is no objective way to determine
whether I am or am not Jesus Christ, the belief that I am, is a religious belief.
the statement that I am not is taking a position, staking out a stand, on my religious claims.
It is not up to Amazon to decide whether or not that is true. When they ban and delete my
account, on the grounds that, or a least claim to, because I am not Jesus Christ and cannot 
use his name, that is religious discrimination on the grounds of their subjective religious
beliefs about my claims. Furthermore, they have staked out a position, whereby
(assuming I was not the second coming which I don't grant) if another person showed up
who really was the second coming, and tried to publish his holy text on Amazon's platform,
their position is the "real" second coming of Christ is not welcome on Amazon,
It precludes Jesus Christ himself from publishing a book. To me it is an utterly indefensible
stance. And I lost something that was very important to me, when I made that principled
objection and refused to compromise on the name, because of discriminatory and 
illegal policy by Amazon."


CREED OMNIBUS BILL #3 - Gangsta Rap Like Tupac

ETERNALIZEDOFFICIAL.COM (1)
by Brendan S. Rose

USED AS EVIDENCE YESTERDAY MORNING AT THE HRTO (Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario)
https://archive.org/details/proof-of-reprisal-google
SEE: Subject File 2025-64274-I - Brendan S Rose - THE OMNIBUS BILL - SECTION 3 - SUBMISSION 1-3 - Names, The Fool, and Violent Art

LYRICS:
eternalisedofficial.com
https://eternalisedofficial.com/2023/05/25/the-psychology-of-the-fool/
 Jungian analyst Marie-Louise von Franz described it as a religious figure embodying chaos and 
creativity, puncturing egos and social norms with irreverent humor. 
thisjungianlife.com
https://thisjungianlife.com/episode-158-the-archetype-of-the-fool/
 The Fool dances through life's absurdities, flaunting the shadow self to expose cultural hypocrisies, 
much like the court jester who speaks uncomfortable truths under the guise of jest. This archetype 
invites integration of the irrational, countering rigid rationality and fostering individuation—the process
of becoming whole. 
jungplatform.com
https://jungplatform.com/article/leaping-with-the-fool-archetype
Esoterically, the Fool reigns as the zeroth card (or unnumbered XXII) of the Tarot's Major Arcana, 
kicking off the "Fool's Journey"—a narrative odyssey through life's mysteries. 
en.wikipedia.org
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fool_(tarot_card)
 Depicted as a carefree youth teetering on a cliff's edge, bindle in hand and dog nipping at heels, the 
Fool symbolizes infinite potential, spontaneity, and faith in the universe. 
thetarotguide.com
https://www.thetarotguide.com/the-fool/
 Upright, it heralds new beginnings, adventure, and unburdened optimism; reversed, it warns of 
recklessness or naivety exploited. 
labyrinthos.co
https://labyrinthos.co/blogs/tarot-card-meanings-list/the-fool-meaning-major-arcana-tarot-cardmeanings
 In decks like Rider-Waite-Smith, the white rose evokes purity, while the infinity symbol above hints at 
eternal cycles. Esoteric traditions tie it to Aleph (the breath of creation) or pure spirit manifesting into 
matter, urging leaps of faith where intellect alone falters. 
ayinpress.org
https://ayinpress.org/what-kind-of-fool-am-i/
The Persona series elevates the Fool to narrative core, assigning it to protagonists as the "Wild Card"—
a vessel of limitless Personas symbolizing the Fool's Journey toward enlightenment.

eternalisedofficial.com (1)

I am God.......

shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL ADVICE TO STYX

A prolific artist, with over 1000 songs in my archives, a youtuber, a rumbler, an author of over 55 books, designer of LUCIFERIANISM on Steam and Epic. Notoriously censored due to my own behavior and extremely controversial music and other works. Father of a boy I have never met (I want to but I'm just not well enough, it's sad.) I am very talented and often achieve great things, but cycles of going from normalcy to mental breakdowns often result in me losing my accounts and platform access and thus my archives in vicious incidents of self destruction resulting in bans. For instance, I am banned from the Amazon and Barnes and Noble press duopoly for this reason, and thus banned from publishing books at all, outright.

MY FOREVER HOME: Archive.org
https://archive.org/search?query=creator%3A%22Brendan+S%2C+Rose%22

LUCIFERIANISM©️

by THE DEVIL 666

Available today on STEAM and EPIC GAMES STORE. #indiegames

It is an open world sandbox, roguelike, soulslike, set in a gargantuan maze of 300 individually constructed levels. Brutal difficulty. Fully voiced by Elevenlabs AI Voice Robots. Built in Unreal Engine 5.4.

[Rated M for Mature.]

STEAM:

https://store.steampowered.com/app/3990500/LUCIFERIANISM/

EPIC:

https://store.epicgames.com/en-US/p/luciferianism-300fc0

THE DEVIL 666 on Youtube
https://www.youtube.com/@BLOODREDGENERALWUKONG

THE DEVIL 666 on Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/c-4862779

BRENDAN ROSE on Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/brendan.s.rose/

Yeah here's the problem man, you go too far, and maybe say things you shouldn't, So you wanna censor those, and maybe you have a justification for doing that, maybe you have a good reason.

But then, 
You wanna censor this now, and that, and this, and that, and that one over there, and this one and that one and FUCKIN EVERYTHING NOW.

Suddenly everything is censored to shit, and no one can say anything without you destroying them.

THIS IS WHY THE LEFT IS TERRIBLE.

I have to look at my life story and say, oh, I have to cut 75% of my life story because of you, It doesn't make sense anymore, more holes than swiss cheese.

MUSIC GENRE(s): Horror, Synth-pop, Rock, 
Girlband Screamo, Comedy, Philosophy,
Religion and Theology, Politics, Truecrime

MY INFERNAL APOSTLES:
1: Styxhexenhammer666
2: Liana K
3: Scott Adams 
4: Vee Monro
5: Doug's Dharma
6: JordanOwen42/Jordan Peterson

I am the lamb who spake as a dragon

THEY WORSHIPPED THE DRAGON, FOR HE HAD GIVEN AUTHORITY TO THE BEAST, AND THEY WORSHIPPED THE BEAST SAYING "who is like the beast and who can fight against it?"

Ever since I was a child, I wanted to be the beast with two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon. I did not really expect to become him, but I did.

You will take the chip or die.

Those who die will live forever in heaven, though
those who take chip shall liveth forever on earth.
And never again shall they meet.

THE BEAST RELIGON
https://drive.proton.me/urls/QNPN2Z720W#7UrpVDmRPKOL

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL - SETTLEMENT OFFER WITH AMAZON

EMPOWERED FEMINIST STOLE MY BABY (EFSMB)