My interview is targeted toward anyone who would listen to an interview about multimodal composing. I start off by introducing Brittany and Nikkita as UCF students studying Writing and Rhetoric. My first two questions are asking how they have seen multimodal composition change as well as their personal experience with it. This is to boost their ethos so the listener knows these people are qualified to speak on the subject.
    The exigence of this piece is to get varying perspectives on multimodal composing. Throughout the interview we hear similar, but individual perspectives and reasoning. This shows the audience that multimodal composing is open to interpretation and ambiguous. In the interview different ideas are tossed around, but they are not conflicting, they even complement one another at times.
    I used a couple assets. First being the music I selected. I choose music that I feel best suited the mood of the questions and response. For the beginning, when the students are reflecting on their own experience, I used a track that has more of a reflective, somber vibe. Later in the interview I start asking questions like, “Why do you think teachers keep pushing alphabetic composition over multi-modal composition?” I added some music that was a little more intense to add some tension and excitement to the interview.
For some of the questions, I removed the music and only played it during the response to give the question more weight. I also framed the interview a few times to keep the listener on track and let them know where I was going with the interview. 
    At one point, my interviewee, Brittany said she did not agree with one of my questions. So, to add to the excitement, I shouted “Burn!” in the background. This will be used as my original sound effect/asset. I end it all with a thrilling conclusion, complete with an audience applauding and cheering.  

Trace EZ