“(NO)BODY HAS TO GO” navigates the delicate threshold between life and death, embracing the paradox at its core: while no one wants to lose the ones they love, the soul is destined to move on. The title itself plays with this contradiction, the inevitability of departure contrasted with the human desire to hold on. Death, in this context, is not an end but a portal, a silent passage into a new dimension.
The soundscape unfolds within an ambient electronic atmosphere, enveloping the listener in a world that feels both earthly and otherworldly. Its shifts in tone and texture mirror the soul’s transitions from presence to absence, from the tangible to the transcendent. The music flows like an inner tide, moving through states of clarity, disorientation, surrender, and serenity.
At its core, the piece is about acceptance, a surrender to the unknown that lies beyond the visible. There is a quiet reverence in the way it treats loss, not as devastation but as transformation. The emotion is deep, yet not desperate. Mournful, yet not without peace. It reflects the bittersweet truth that letting go is also an act of love.
“(NO)BODY HAS TO GO” is not a goodbye. It is a release. A moment of stillness in the face of the infinite, where grief and grace exist side by side, and where the soul, unbound, begins again.

(NO)BODY HAS TO GO

“SILENCE IN CHAOS” reflects on the quiet that lives within the noise and the noise that gives meaning to the quiet. It speaks to a fundamental duality: stillness and motion, calm and intensity, existing not in opposition but through one another. One defines the other and in their coexistence, beauty takes form.
The title holds a paradox, yet within it there is balance. Silence is not an escape from chaos and chaos is not the end of silence. They move as one, shifting and blending like two currents of the same stream. Beneath the surface, the piece subtly evokes the timeless idea that opposites are not separate but interwoven, each carrying a trace of the other.
Built on an ambient house foundation, the track unfolds through waves of texture and rhythm. Its pulse is steady yet gentle, inviting the listener into a space where tension and release live side by side. There are moments where sound feels suspended in midair and others where movement dissolves into stillness. The music flows without resistance and without urgency.
At its core, this piece invites attention without expectation. It does not seek to resolve but to reveal the beauty within contrast. It is not about silencing the chaos or disrupting the silence but allowing both to speak in turn and in tandem.
“SILENCE IN CHAOS” is not a contradiction. It is a meeting point. A quiet carried within motion and a motion shaped by quiet. In their exchange something whole begins to emerge.

SILENCE IN CHAOS

“WHAT YOU WANNA BE?” revolves around the play of identities we adopt in our relationships. We are never just one thing, never fully transparent, especially with those we are closest to. The track explores this constant transformation, the subtle shift between sincerity and performance, between desire and adaptation.

The title itself is an open, provocative question asking who we choose to be in intimacy. But it also suggests that every mask is, in the end, just another possible version of ourselves. The complexity of self-expression is laid bare, showing how we constantly shift between roles to navigate the expectations and emotions of those we love.

Built on a house electronic foundation, the track pulses with rhythmic energy, moving through layers of sound that mirror the shifting nature of identity. There’s a tension between fluidity and structure, a constant motion that never feels settled. The beats and synths weave in and out, creating a space where the self can be both fluid and fragmented, while still holding a core.

At its core, the piece invites us to question who we truly are in our relationships, and how much of that self is shaped by the roles we take on. It’s not about hiding, but about the performance we all engage in, sometimes unknowingly, in the dance of love.

“WHAT YOU WANNA BE?” is not about choosing between masks or authenticity. It’s about embracing the complexity of both, understanding that in love, we are many things at once. A question with no single answer, just endless possibilities.

WHAT YOU WANNA BE?

“CHANGING” portrays a person who feels drained and overwhelmed by the expectations of others. The protagonist seems forced to change themselves to please those around them, to the point of losing almost everything except their memories, which remain the only thing they cannot alter or fix.

There is a sense of resignation in their willingness to adapt, even if it means compromising their own truth. The mention of seeking refuge in chaos or excess suggests an attempt to escape reality, even if only temporarily.

The chorus conveys a feeling of sacrifice, where the protagonist keeps giving everything they have to people who don’t truly appreciate it. They feel like they are wasting their time with individuals who lack depth or understanding. In the end, there is a strong sense of loss and confusion, as they struggle to move forward while feeling increasingly drained and disconnected from meaning.

Overall, the song expresses themes of alienation, self-sacrifice, and emotional exhaustion, with the protagonist feeling trapped in a life that is slowly depleting them.

CHANGING

“FOOL FOR YA’” delves into the emotional conflict of an individual entangled in an overwhelming and intense relationship, where desire and dependency intertwine to create an unstable equilibrium. The connection is not merely passionate, it is addictive, driven by the unpredictable highs and devastating lows that define the dynamic.
At its core, the relationship resembles a psychological rollercoaster, orchestrated by a partner who thrives on control and emotional manipulation. Moments of euphoria and deep connection are followed by sudden detachment, leaving the individual disoriented and craving the next high. This cycle, often fueled by narcissistic tendencies, keeps one trapped in a state of uncertainty, always seeking validation yet never receiving it consistently.
The temptation to surrender to this chaotic game, where affection is weaponized and emotions are manipulated, becomes both intoxicating and destructive. There is a constant internal struggle between the desire to hold on to fleeting moments of warmth and the painful awareness of being caught in a dynamic that erodes self-worth. The unpredictable shifts in affection create a dependency, as the individual clings to the hope that the next high will last, even though the pattern remains unchanged.
Within this emotional labyrinth, self-expression becomes a challenge. Words remain unspoken, emotions suppressed, as fear of rejection or further manipulation takes hold. What initially seemed like passion turns into an emotional prison, where the illusion of closeness masks a profound sense of isolation.
Ultimately, the realization dawns that this is not love, but control disguised as connection. Yet, breaking free proves to be the ultimate challenge. The recognition of the toxic cycle is not enough to escape its grip, as the emotional addiction is stronger than logic. “FOOL FOR YA’” captures this paradox: the desperate need to let go, contrasted with the irresistible pull to stay, even when the price is one's own emotional well-being.


FOOL FOR YA'

“G(O)OD LIAR” moves within the blurred boundary between what is shown and what is real. On the surface, it feels like a confrontation between two people, but just beneath lies something far more intimate: an inner voice speaking quietly but firmly. The track explores the quiet tension between the image we create to be accepted and the truths we avoid facing. It’s not an argument, but a moment of clarity, where the self begins to see through its own disguise.
The soundscape, deep, fluid, and atmospheric, creates the feeling of drifting through a mental space suspended between awareness and denial. The ambient textures don’t shout; they whisper, evoking the familiar ease with which one learns to pretend. The mask, worn for comfort or survival, begins to thin, and slowly reveals what was meant to stay hidden.
“G(O)OD LIAR” does not accuse or condemn. It recognizes the human need to deceive ourselves in order to cope, to be loved, to stay safe. But it also stands at the edge of that turning point, where the performance becomes a prison, and the role we play in our relationships ceases to be a choice. The song lives in that crack, where self-awareness starts to speak and the illusion begins to falter.
More than a song, it’s a mirror. The listener might believe it’s about someone else, but in time, they may realize the voice has been speaking to them all along.

G(O)OD LIAR

“SYN(CHRONICITY)” unfolds in that subtle space where coincidence feels too precise to be chance, yet too intangible to be fully trusted. It isn’t about events aligning; it’s about meaning emerging in the gaps between them. The track doesn’t present a story, but rather a sensation: of being caught in a moment that feels scripted by something larger than logic, yet authored by the self.
At its core, the piece explores the fragile dance between control and surrender. It poses an unspoken question: what if the patterns we notice aren’t random, but reflections? Echoes of something internal surfacing through the external world. It’s not about fate, but resonance. The way two moments, two people, two thoughts seem to vibrate at the same frequency, even if they’ve never met.
The sound world is fluid, hypnotic, almost circular. It draws the listener into loops of memory and possibility. There’s a sense of inevitability to it, like walking toward something you’ve never seen but always felt. Layers emerge and dissolve like thoughts we almost grasp in dreams: elusive, but insistent.
“SYN(CHRONICITY)” doesn’t offer answers. Instead, it opens a window. A window onto the mystery of timing, not just in the world, but in ourselves. The moment when something clicks, not because it makes sense, but because it feels true. It speaks to the part of us that longs for connection deeper than cause and effect, where intuition takes over and we stop needing to know why.
This is not just a song. It is an invitation to listen beyond the surface, to trust the invisible threads, and perhaps to realize that the pattern we seek out there may have always been inside us.


SYN(CHRONICITY)

“L.O.V.E. (links over vibrational eternity)” moves through the deeper architecture of reality: not the visible structures, but the currents beneath. It draws from the idea that everything in the universe, from particles to planets, noise to silence, is enfolded within a single, unbroken wholeness. What we often call “love” in our human terms may be just a fleeting echo of that deeper coherence.

This piece doesn’t follow a narrative. It unfolds like a hologram: each part containing the whole, each vibration a window into the eternal now. Influenced by Bohm’s vision of implicate order, “L.O.V.E.” invites the listener into that dimension where distinctions dissolve, and where connection is not made but remembered.

It’s not a love song. It’s a recognition of the field in which all things participate. A sonic meditation on how even seemingly inanimate matter hums with a kind of knowing. It reaches for that hidden link that binds the animate and the inanimate, the inner and the outer, the self and the cosmos.

“L.O.V.E.” is about vibration as memory, as truth. A gesture toward that undivided wholeness beneath appearance, where what we call “connection” is simply the recognition that we were never truly separate.

L.O.V.E.

too many references you can’t recognize

(NO)BODY HAS TO GO

MANARA

Related tracks