Screening Time's Gravity

Factory Forged

"rendezvous, bout a round supper, but here if for the grace of full moon foodstuffs. upside-down pan fried bat wing silver dollar cakes (200 of them), made-to-rain. bandz-a-make her dans -- all night moves the movie with my glued eyes on the boob. thereafter then stumbling from baltic to boardwalk, backwards (do re-collect). don't forget to set the sundial ahead."

Sundial Saving Time

"You can sell me anywhere, don’t settle me down. Make me everywhere, but don’t ask me how. Pimp me without quota, wipe me in dew by piecemeal. A Dare-o. Then all me a little predernity and then. Basically, just fucking shoehorn fix the foot in mouth of door. Guttit."

Shoewhore

GetYourLifeTogether

A personal note that I'm sure will come in handy.

Art Is To Be Shared

Tripartite Duality Of Loss

The joissance of ‘just so’. Picture yourself as always fetishistically disavowing the immediate pleasure of existence. Straining instead toward the desire of want. Passing blindly, in reverse, through the gate of desire confuses the immediate sensorial function of call-to-action. Undoing the desire makes anxiety the object of an hysterical break and leaves a trace of filth toward the original unachievable object, which could never have been captured even following the pleasure principle. What remains is an abstract potential (anti-anxiety), based on the law of conservation, for a just-so joissance, which, if inverted, would be an unbounding excess of rapture. The same thermodynamic tract that would lead to this overflow of pleasure becomes a phantom object which one can only be called to by the prompting of the other. We are mostly following the tracts and then instinctively disavowing the objects. It is only through the gut-wrenchingly violent act of return that we can find reprieve. Relief and release are still functions of the immediate disavowal of the real until symbolization occurs.

Just-so

There are false crises that happen on a regular basis. They are human error of a higher function. It is as if we Need things to go wrong.

This is something that can only be understood from a truly abstract standpoint. The basic idea behind abstraction here is that it is an understanding which contemplates through drives and laws, not desires and causality. It is where physics meets psycho-analysis. We are animals, yes, and behave in particular, predictable ways — ways which would point towards a survival of the self or of the species. But there is a way of understanding the limits of these activities which cannot be bound by common sense determinations.

It is as if we are always brushing up against the infinite nature of our universal dimension and its preconditions of reality which are impossible to truly explain or predict. Not because they are so profound, per se. More to the point, they are more radical.

No matter the span or scope of a chain of events, there will be a mark of radical doubt that will elaborate a particular plane of determination. In the short instance, when something jarring happens between two or more people, say in conversation, we cannot disregard its existence even if it is unspoken and impossibly brief. And if there is a long trend (hours, days, years) based on a particular causal chain, even if we can grow accustomed to it, have faith in it, there will always be an undoing through an unsymbolized embedded opening. To speak of this evental doubt as being the origin of the potential for the associated proceedings is like blaming the fourth dimension for making the third dimension imperfect. It just is so. It doesn’t mean that the truth has come out, only that the meaning has been set (symbolically categorized) by the impossibility of furthering the chain of continuity. Or vice versa, the impossibility of full meaning disallows for the chain of continuity not to be set.

Why does it ring false to say that we don’t know right unless there is wrong? Because this dichotomy can’t grasp the crisis of chaos rendered by the dimensionality of all things. Things go wrong because drives are more basically positioned than desires and laws more universal (less human) than causes. Not, as is often the conceit, through any careful balance or omnipotent design. And after the rift, if we try to recount or explain the sequence, as it settles back into its prior meta-physical form, we find the lingering of the over-activity leaves chance for reconfiguration of desires and causes.

How does this manifest in the actions of those who haven’t yet realized or verbalized it completely? They have an absorbed reticence. A learned disavowal of limitations. They make errors happen as if systematically, robotically, so as to mirror the Real of radical doubt in a desperate attempt to control it. For those who can contemplate it, they try and manipulate its potential — manufacturing crisis in order to reassert their status quo. There cannot simply be a goings-on that binds us completely. This would not allow itself to harden. Once faith is placed in “the rules”, decay, destruction or revolution is sublimated as an excessive value.

Total control is only an illusion from a not yet fully realized future’s past.

nobumassiah