night

Are you a master of your emotions? How do banks learn to loan better? Is king less queen = boy less girl in the word2vec world? Does your ‘body’ sometimes feel inferior even when you do not think so? Do humans learn only cognitively? How do you learn to have self respect? Are models a result of learning? What can be learnt by trial and error? Can mere prompts sometimes be enough to learn vast new things? Are there unthought knowns? Can you have the thought of going to dinner without thinking in a language? What is the nature of internal representations in between the multiple layers of neural networks? Do we acquire languages sub-consciously? How does one account for integrated multilingualism? How do you speak with your Gods? Is grammar social? Did sociality (& then spoken language, & then writing systems) evolve (or exapt) from tool making? What is hunger for LLMs if it has never itself gone hungry? Why does the familiar feel safer? Can machines learn behaviorally (without modeling/cerebration)? Why do couples sometimes fight over the same issues after several years? What are your default neural pathways? &, what can AI do in the future? SynTalk thinks about these & more questions using ideas from psychotherapy (Aruna Gopakumar, Navgati, Bangalore), computer science (Dr. Shivaram Kalyanakrishnan, IIT Bombay, Mumbai), & linguistics (Prof. Pramod Pandey, Deccan College, Pune). Listen in...

#TLAN (The Learnable And Not) --- SynTalk

Is pencil complex? Is computationally hard complex? Is ‘i’ a weird number? Why wasn’t Hamilton able to multiply triples? Are we just a bunch of neurons and connections? Is our ability to think (& do mathematics) an emergent phenomenon? Is mathematical thinking core to understanding the world? Is complexity always a subjective feature? Do opinions spread in complex random graph-like patterns? How is alternating current complex? How do quaternions help with (3D rotations) in computer graphics? Are there (irreducible) prime complex numbers? Can real prime numbers be understood via functions of complex variables? How is the idea of ‘limit’ (& continuity, & differentiability) different on a complex plane? Is something more complex the more you can talk about it? Can there be a general theory for conditions leading to complexity? Are all complex systems many bodied? Will several emergent phenomena & biological systems see invention of a new kind of math to understand them? Will computational models (& ever more complex machines) likely precede such mathematics? &, will more branches of sciences / knowledge keep getting more integrated? SynTalk thinks about these & more questions using ideas from electrical engineering (Prof. D. Manjunath, IIT Bombay, Mumbai), non-linear science (Prof. Ram Ramaswamy, IIT Delhi, New Delhi), & mathematics (Dr. Kaneenika Sinha, IISER, Pune). Listen in...

#TTTC (The Transformations To Complex) --- SynTalk

Episode 1, 1 December 2014, Gautama Buddha’s First Truth

Gautama Buddha’s First teaching, the first of the Four Noble Truths, is that there is suffering.

Suffering is inescapable and manifests in three forms: the suffering of pain, the suffering of happiness and, the all pervasive suffering.
Through fully understanding this first teaching, and appreciating the true nature of our relationship with the world, we see how suffering is unavoidable and necessarily manifests in our lives.

Only then are we are able to seek a solution; firstly, through identification of its causes, the teaching of the Second Noble Truth.

Intro - Welcome to Buddhism Guide’s Audio blog, a contemporary look at Gautama Buddhist Teachings, from Karma Yeshe Rabgye.
      * Find out more at http://buddhismguide.org

[00:19] This episode: Gautama Buddha’s First teaching.
      * On the Four Noble Truths;
      * The foundation on which Buddhism is built.
     
[00:47] The First Noble Truth: There is suffering.
      * The definition of suffering;
      * A dissatisfaction, discontentment, an uneasy feeling running through our lives. 
      * Gautama Buddha stated that there are three types of suffering:
        1. The Suffering of pain - our daily, physical and mental suffering;
        2. The Suffering of happiness - the lurking, just around the corner suffering of the the sadness that comes from loss - the change of happiness;
        3. The all pervasive Suffering - a condition that exists because of how we perceive ourselves in relation to the world. You could say that our entire worldly experience is a definition of suffering that we can’t even see.

[03:50] How do we see ourselves in the world?
      * Separate: I’m here, and the world is outside of me. In other words as subject and object. We see ourselves as the solid, independent self.
      * This is not true, we are actually the coming together of 5 things.

[04:20] The Five Aggregates
      * So the way we look at things: subject and object, me and everything else, is in some way, the cause of our suffering and that will come back to us in the future.
      * Like eating a wonderful meal but not knowing it has been poisoned.

[04:56] So why did Buddha want us to know that we have suffering in our lives?
      * To help us understand we have a problem. If we don’t know we have a problem we will not look for a solution;
      * If we know we are suffering we will look for the causes of the suffering and a cure;
      * If we fully understand this First Truth we can move onto the the next Noble Truth - The causes of suffering.

[05:55] Outro
      * You can find more information about this subject in Karma Yeshe 
Rabgye’s books at http://buddhismguide.org/books/
        1. The best way to catch a snake – A Practical Guide to the Buddha’s Teachings;
        2. Life’s meandering path – A Secular Approach to Gautama Buddha’s Guide to Living;
        3. Ripples in the stream – A Pragmatic Journey Through Gautama Buddha’s Teachings.
      
      * They’re available now, from Amazon and Kindle.
      * Thank you for listening, and I hope you enjoyed this blog post.

Gautama Buddha's First Truth

Episode 3, 3 December 2014, Gautama Buddha’s Second Truth

Intro Welcome to Buddhism Guide’s Audio blog

    A contemporary look at Gautama Buddha’s Teachings, from Karma Yeshe Rabgye.
    Find out more, at http://www.buddhismguide.org
    A transcript of this episode can be found at http://buddhismguide.org/audio-blog-archive/audio-blog-transcripts

This Episode: Gautama Buddha’s Second Truth. [00:17]

    In the First Truth, Gautama Buddha encouraged us to fully understand that there is suffering in every corner of our lives.
    In his Second Truth, he tells us what causes these sufferings.

1. Desire [01:05]
    Our desires are never-ending.
    Once we have something new, we start wanting something else.
    So, if we understand this we will not become attached to things, which in turn will end that particular type of suffering.

2. Anger and Aversion. [02:37]
    Aversion is the opposite to attachment,
    and Anger leads to hatred, discrimination, aggression, and a lack of compassion.

3. Unawareness [05:41]
    Here unawareness means: lack of understanding of the true nature of things.
    
Outro [08:04]
    You can find more information about this subject in Karma Yeshe Rabgye’s books at http://www.buddhismguide.org/books/
        The best way to catch a snake – A Practical Guide to the Buddha’s Teachings;
        Life’s meandering path – A Secular Approach to Gautama Buddha’s Guide to Living;
        Ripples in the stream – A Pragmatic Journey Through Gautama Buddha’s Teachings.
    They’re available now, from Amazon and Kindle.
    Thank you for listening, and I hope you enjoyed this blog post.

Gautama Buddha's Second Truth

Episode 5, 5 December 2014, Gautama Buddha's Third Truth

Intro Welcome to Buddhism Guide’s Audio blog.

    A contemporary look at Gautama Buddha’s Teachings, from Karma Yeshe Rabgye.
    Find out more, at http://www.buddhismguide.org
    A transcript of this episode is available at http://www.buddhismguide.org/audio-blog-archive/audio-blog-transcripts/episode-5-transcript-gautama-buddhas-third-truth

This Episode: Gautama Buddha's Third Truth. [00:17]
1. This Truth is called Nirvana, liberation, enlightenment, and so on [00:22]
    Some think, that if you reach Nirvana you will never be born again, others think you will be reborn, but you can pick where.
    For people who do not believe in rebirth, they see it as something we can achieve in this lifetime.

2. The Highest Happiness. [01:46]
    Gautama Buddha said that Nirvana is the highest happiness, but he wasn't talking about mundane happiness we strive for in our everyday lives.
    He was talking about absolute freedom from evil, freedom from craving, attachment, desire, hatred and unawareness.
    All of this we can achieve in this very lifetime by truly understanding the Four Nobel Truths, and following the Eight-fold Path.
    Once we start mediating on these teachings and turning them from knowledge to wisdom, we will start to change our actions of body, speech and mind.
    Remember, knowledge is something learned, something intellectual, whereas wisdom is a part of our very lives.

3. The first bit of good news. [02:39]
    So this is the first bit of good news.
    Nirvana can be reached by anyone, whether they call themselves Buddhist or not.
    You just have to put in the work.

4. A Second Bit of Good News. [04:02]
    So this is a second bit of good news.
        We do not have to die to attain Nirvana.
        It can be obtained during this lifetime.

5. We do not have to die to realise Nirvana. [04:54]
    So in a nutshell I believe Nirvana isn't a metaphysical thing, it isn't a place to go to, and we do not have to die to realise Nirvana.
    It is an extinguishing of our afflictive states of mind and can be reached by anyone in this very lifetime.

Outro. [05:14]
    You can find more information about this subject in Karma Yeshe Rabgye’s books at http://www.buddhismguide.org/books/
        The best way to catch a snake – A Practical Guide to the Buddha’s Teachings;
        Life’s meandering path – A Secular Approach to Gautama Buddha’s Guide to Living;
        Ripples in the stream – A Pragmatic Journey Through Gautama Buddha’s Teachings.
    They’re available now, from Amazon and Kindle.
    Thank you for listening, and I hope you enjoyed this blog post.

Gautama Buddha's Third Truth

Episode 6, 6 December 2014, Gautama Buddha's Fourth Truth.

Intro: Welcome to Buddhism Guide’s Audio blog.

    A contemporary look at Gautama Buddha’s Teachings, from Karma Yeshe Rabgye.
    Find out more, at http://www.buddhismguide.org
    A transcript of this episode is available at http://buddhismguide.org/audio-blog-archive/audio-blog-transcripts/episode-6-transcript-gautama-buddhas-fourth-truth

This Episode: Gautama Buddha's Fourth Truth. [00:17]
1. What is your view? [00:22]

    In the fourth of Gautama Buddha's truths, he explains the path we need to take to free ourselves from suffering.
    It is known as the Eightfold Path, and it comprises of three aspects:
        Seeing Clearly, is the first part and it includes:
            Right View, and
            Right Intention.
 
2. Right View. [01:19]

    Setting out on the Eightfold Path without the Right View is like starting a journey without a map.
    If you get into your car without knowing where you are going and what landmarks you are going to encounter along the way, you are bound to get lost.
    Similarly, if you set of on this path and have no idea what you are doing you will become lost and disillusioned.
    First, get the view correct and the rest will become clearer.

3. Cause and Effect, and Karma. [02:52]

    Here, some would say we need to understand the workings of Karma, but this is such a hot potato these days.
    If you believe in Karma and Rebirth, and it motivates you to be a good person, then follow that view.
    However if you are not a lover of Rebirth, and prefer to keep your Buddhism firmly planted in this life, then you should understand the workings of Cause and Effect.
        Whatever we do there will be a result.
    Life is like an echo:
        Whatever you put out comes back;
    Once you have the Right View concerning Suffering and Cause and Effect, you will be ready to move along the path.
    Next time, I'll talk about Right Intention.

Outro. [04:55]

    You can find more information about this subject in Karma Yeshe Rabgye’s books at http://www.buddhismguide.org/books/
        The best way to catch a snake – A Practical Guide to the Buddha’s Teachings;
        Life’s meandering path – A Secular Approach to Gautama Buddha’s Guide to Living;
        Ripples in the stream – A Pragmatic Journey Through Gautama Buddha’s Teachings.
    They’re available now, from Amazon and Kindle.
    Thank you for listening, and I hope you enjoyed this blog post.

Gautama Buddha's Fourth Truth

Who does the kidnapping and raping? Are you a parasite? Is your politics in the service of capital? Do the lumpen form one group/class, or is it a general disposition? Are the punk ‘anti-social’ disruptors? Was Namdeo Dhasal punk? Was Kabir? Why write obscene poetry? How (& by whom) are the boundaries policed? What leads to the various underground anti-aesthetic movements (such as punk music, & anti-poetry) across cultures? How was Sex Pistols born? Does the notion of (unemployed, & all other) waste come only with modernity and capitalism? Is the oppositional market for shit, trash, & filth, then, created by a certain death drive in us? Can suffering be enjoyed? Where do you seek solidarity? Did late industrialization lead to fascism in Europe? How do political and aesthetic imaginations influence each other? Do the poor need aesthetic tools to agitate? What happens when industries rust? Are we now passing through a phase of barbarism? Is culture necessarily a good thing? Are you (truly) interested in abolishing inequality? Can the proletariat be precariat proletariat? &, are the lumpen forces (the ‘surplus population’) now here to stay forever? SynTalk thinks about these & more questions using ideas from literary studies (Dr. Nandini Chandra, University of Hawai’i, Honolulu), music production (Kunal Dole, Punk On Toast, Mumbai), & political science/poetry (Prof. Ashwani Kumar, TISS, Mumbai). Listen in...

#TPHAL (The Punk Hooligan And Lumpen) --- SynTalk

What happened in the 6th century BCE? Can a non-human (robot? dog?) have a soul? Does God’s time move from the past to the future? Is the present, in a sense, always avant-garde? How are bureaucratic orders made to perpetuate in time? How does a common person today understand the yugas? Who has the ‘need’ to think about the future? How are different time periods squeezed into a single register in art? Why do we invoke ramrajya? Do ideal types constrain how far (& ‘how’) one can think of the future? What did women joining the Buddhist sanghas (not) cause? Could science fiction become a historical artefact? Is a ‘genius’ science fiction writer akin to a ‘genius’ scientist? Is religion all about survival? Are religion, art and politics interwoven in the pharaoh? Are the pyramids, megaliths, Stonehenge, & the Chinese burial pits for the immediate afterlife of the dead or the future of those later alive? Are genealogies often invented? Is there a part of us that ‘needs’ to believe? Do we wish that the future were pre-ordained? Do we inhabit multiple temporalities? &, when is the messiah coming (back)? SynTalk thinks about these & more questions using ideas from art history (Dr. Shailka Mishra, Jagdish and Kamla Mittal Museum of Indian Art, Hyderabad), theology (Prof. Ori Z. Soltes, Georgetown University, Washington DC), & ancient history (Dr. Meera Visvanathan, Shiv Nadar University, Greater Noida). Listen in...

#TSOFF (The Susurrus Of Former Futures) --- SynTalk

How ‘deep’ would a 1,000 years be? Is all space place? How do use, identity, value, law, power, or (‘imaginative’) memory hold them together? Do we live in layers? Are all human beings historical? Are all places relational? How do ‘material’ cultures of the past enable excavation sites to be dated? Where do ghosts and Gods live? Do all humans think of a place the same way? Can power structures lead to discursive spaces becoming material ‘reality’? What is the wilderness for you? Do you follow official maps? Do you know the seating configuration of the people you are hearing just now? What was below the Mosque? Is land a fictitious commodity? Is it possible to have an affective relationship with a property without having a legal claim? When is a place abandoned? How does a community disintegrate? Could long standing customary rights co-exist with legal rights? Is Law fiction? Are most relational boundaries always in a state of flux? Do leopards also want to take it easy? & How will we interpret our linkages and places in the future – would all space be propertied, financialized & commodified? SynTalk thinks about these & more questions using ideas from anthropology & film-making (Prof. Ashish Avikunthak, The University of Rhode Island, Kingston), human ecology (Prof. Asmita Kabra, Ambedkar University, New Delhi), & history (Prof. Anindita Mukhopadhyay, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad). Listen in...

#TPOP (The Production Of Places) --- SynTalk

How do the disposable get marked out? Which institutions have cognitive control over you? How do you develop railways in Argentina? Who changes institutions? Is it always from ‘within’? Do institutions help us with the ‘higher order’ decisions? Are military, markets, prisons, families, religions, borders, languages, & villages coercive in the same way? Are prisons (in reality) chaotic? What’s the price of joining an institution? Is there conformity of opinion around you? Do religions evolve? How do you think of the family? Do institutionalization and socialization go hand in hand? ‘When’ do markets need to be regulated? Are cryptocurrencies really a counter-current?  Does our continuous search for meaning gives Religion its power? Do universities live longer than political organizations? What are universities from the perspective of the dropout? Does the world need one anchor currency? Can algorithms be inclusive of local issues? Have institutions, thus far, been spatially bound? What would planetary scale institutions look like in the future? ‘How’ are the marginal voices to be heard? &, are nation states the best institutional form for the modern world? SynTalk thinks about these & more questions using ideas from sociology (Prof. Mahuya Bandyopadhyay, IIT Delhi, New Delhi), economics (Prof. A. Damodaran, IIM Bangalore, Bangalore), & history (Prof. Srinath Raghavan, Ashoka University, Delhi (NCR)). Listen in...

#TOOI (The Order Of Institutions) --- SynTalk

What do you expect to see on windy islands? Can you soar? Are there a finite number of ways of flying? Did we glide before flying? Do birds & insects fly like planes, & vice versa? How are the lift-off forces and moments generated? Was the Wright Flyer I (which made the first sustained manned flight in 1903) actually a very bad design? Do flies fly merely by seeing? Are wings thermo-regulatory devices? Why has flying evolved several times across different species? How many times of its own weight can flying structures take? How should flying carpets be made? Does it matter to the moth what the value of ‘g’ is? How might dragonfly wingspan change with atmospheric oxygen content? Can airplanes fly like sharks swim? Why shiver? How are/would the helicopters that fly on Mars (be) different? How will a balloon inflate on Venus? Are biological flyers far more efficient than the human engineered ones – how? Do birds and insects of the same size fly similarly? How are unmanned and manned systems different? Why don’t we have faster commercial flights (given they are possible)? Can one expect to see new ways and manners of flying? Will we ‘fly’ to Mars at some point? &, is there still a lot of ground to cover? SynTalk thinks about these & more questions using ideas from aeronautical engineering (Prof. Rajkumar Pant, IIT Bombay, Mumbai), & neurobiology & physiology (Prof. Sanjay Sane, NCBS, Bangalore). Listen in...

#TGFF (The Grounds For Flight) --- SynTalk

Are you a lobby strategist? Do you negotiate with yourself? Which taste group do you belong to? What are you allowed to see? Do you pay to publish? Do the algorithms that serve you change with you? How are counterpublics generated? Is society constantly transforming itself? What role does capital play? Does media influence human rationality? Are you able to tell real discourse and propaganda apart? Was there ‘public opinion’ (say) a 1000 years ago? Does public sphere have capitalistic roots? What happens to niche ideas in an information supermarket? Are newspapers opinion ‘takers’? Have most modern societies moved from being axiomatic to algorithmic? Can one have societies without a moral discourse? What happens to our base instincts? Do you have the ability of have your own individual opinion? However, are niche morals undesirable? Do ads serve a symbolic norm-making function as well? ‘How’ do you go after your ‘target’ audience? Is it alright if mass media becomes ‘hyper personal’? Is the public just a sum of the all the individual echo chambers? &, what is the kind of public that we want? SynTalk thinks about these & more questions using ideas from philosophy (Dr. Muzaffar Ali Malla, Islamic University of Science and Technology (IUST), Avantipura (J&K)), social sciences (Prof. Narendar Pani, NIAS, Bangalore), & media studies (Dr. Vibodh Parthasarathi, Jamia Millia Islamia, Delhi). Listen in...

#TOOP (The Oxygen Of Publicity) --- SynTalk

Do you have neanderthal DNA? Is your body your identity? What makes the knowledge of death possible when no one alive has experienced it first hand? How does dying feel? What are your schemas for understanding death? Is death the default, & it is life that happens occasionally? Does a cell know when it ought to die? When is an organism dead? When can we not dream? Can (certain) tissues and organs regenerate? What are the biochemical reactions a response to? What does oxygen do? Does the concept of death make control over others possible? Can we reverse death itself? What is the 'location' of a person? Do all cells come from other living cells? Or, can cells be created artificially from scratch? Is the body inferior to atman? Intrinsically, is everything conscious? Why do we see matter around if it's all one consciousness? Is Higg's boson dead? Do the cells need to divide to avoid death? Is dying like falling in deep sleep, & do we therefore die everyday? How does structure and order reproduce? What did you inherit from your mother at birth? Can dead mammoths be resurrected? &, will we have the power to create varied artificial life in the future with genome writing? SynTalk thinks about these & more questions using ideas from philosophy of science (Prof. G. Nagarjuna, IISER, Pune), theology (Swami Narasimhananda, Ramakrishna Mission Sevashrama, Kozhikode), & genomic sciences (Prof. Binay Panda, JNU, New Delhi).

#TDAG (The Dead And Gone) --- SynTalk

How do you look at women? Do Goddesses follow Gods? Is the ultimate Reality an ‘It’? What’s the relationship between matter and energy? Are dualities necessarily conflictual? Is Eve inferior to Adam? Where do the Cosmos and the Body intersect? How did the sacred geography of the subcontinent evolve? Do Goddesses have an influence on the lives of men (& kings) & women? Where/how did patriarchy exist? How did Ramabai become Pandita Ramabai? What did the colonial encounter do to the archetypes of Goddesses? How did the early literary women appropriate the Goddesses? Is (only) education responsible for empowerment? Is Vishnu’s primal inner energy essentially female? Who is capable of hedonistic bloodlust? What invoked the wrath of Nanda Devi? Are male and female in a union like speech and meaning? What is evil? Or, dirty? Did women have a voice in pre-Colonial ‘India’? What are your models for feminism? How do courtesans become poet saints and Goddesses? How did the tribal women of India ‘transform a priest’? What might indigenous feminism look like? &, what is the future of the several goddesses & the little (folk) traditions? SynTalk thinks about these & more questions using ideas from cultural studies (Prof. Sachidananda Mohanty, IIAS, Shimla), Dr. M.D. Muthukumaraswamy (folklore studies, Chennai) & Sanskrit studies (Dr. Bihani Sarkar, Lancaster University, Lancaster). Listen in...

#TGIP (The Goddesses In Particular) --- SynTalk

Do you despise your body? Can the body be a source of transcendence? Can one, however, have nothing but only the body? Are we embedded in this world as bodies with other objects, texts, rituals, spectators, and bodies? Is everybody also a biological, physical, social, & political object? Do you see yourself through the eyes of others? Can there be The (disembodied) View from Nowhere? Is it possible to experience the body as the object and subject fused together? Why do we watch dance? Why do dancers dance, & is any movement dance? Why get into tough postures? Why touch? Can the body be ‘nationalised’? What makes martial arts, yoga and dance similar? Does the body ‘do’ the thinking, & can it (though perishable) think about the eternal (soul)? Is there a homologous relationship between the body (pinde) and the cosmos (brahmand)? If we imprison the body long enough do we also end up imprisoning the mind? Is it possible to leave a manual for dance and martial arts? Is life information? What is the very long term future of (dis)embodiment, ‘presence’, and impermanence? Is the body ready? Might it be bypassed? SynTalk thinks about these & more questions using concepts and experiences from philosophy (Dr. Kim Diaz, US Department of Justice, Texas), political theory & poetry (Prof. Bishnu M. Mohapatra, Forum on Contemporary Theory, Vadodara), & dance (Aparna Uppaluri, NCBS, Bangalore). Listen in....

#TCOE (The Conundrums Of Embodiment) --- SynTalk

f(q) = How old are passports? (#TFON)

SynTalk is a freewheeling interdisciplinary talk show with a philosophical approach to understanding the world from a long term perspective.

#TCOE (The Conundrums Of Embodiment) --- SynTalk

SynTalk

Related tracks