Axel F - "Crazy Frog" (HARD TECHNO REMIX)

Prepared this Podcast to go with an email to 3v in which I issue a SAR for particular information surrounding my Ban from Burn2. This is the Ban that went from 0 to Lifetime Ban No Appeals, The Ban that seemed to magically make a complaint against Certain Leads magically disappear. The SAR comes off the back of The recent Octoburn Event at Burn2 which saw a 39% drop in traffic over the same event the previous year.

For the sake of citing my sources this podcast was generated from NotebookLM. 

The specific prompt was requesting they focus on the draft of an email I was about to send to 3v. 

The notebook in question has All the information from Burn2.org, The lamplighters site, The entire of the UK and EU GDPR regulations, The legal documents from SL, LL, TIllia, Discord, BurningMan. The rangers manuals (Burn2, BRC 19 and BRC 24). All The documentation I could find about Burning Man Regional Coordinators  and  a massive amount of other stuff from Burn2 and Burning Man. There are also large documents included on the subject of transparency in Non-Projects, through to many documents in the field of psychology.  It has meeting minutes for this entire years worth of planning meetings at Burn2, All of the minutes from Lamp lighters meetings.  Then also all of the notecards Talia sent to people.  Huge  amounts of IM from both Discord and SL between Talia and Key figures within this situation.  

I should state that I did not cherry-pick There is, to put it bluntly, too much stuff for me to have done so. 

NotebookLM can hold 50 sources of information. Each of those sources can be up to 500,000 words or 200meg.  

I have written a script that will concatenate different sources together until they reach that 500k word limit. So the grand total word count that a single note book can hold is  25,000,000 Words.  

I would confidently say that the amount of data I am at at the moment is probably over 5 million words.

Burn2, Talia and Her SAR.

I really love notebookLM, It's so good being able to have something that knows as much as it can do about specific topics and then just randomly throwing curve balls at it to see how it deals with them. For example asking it to break down a situation based on a random other story. 
I should point out that there was a version of this one that was from the view point of a christmas carol as well.. Guess who I came out as in that story? I'll give you a clue... Alliteration ;)

Burn 2, Winterburn & Grinch

So obviously I've written my own set of by laws... But I had a sudden thought earlier... 
"Random thought... and not what I was trying to talk to the ever silent Dr D about. It might work it might not, but why not have the By-Laws team make no decisions with the exception of what questions need to be answered by the resultant by-laws, instead prepare a questionnaire so that each thing that needs addressing has a multichoice/other to it. Would be pretty simple to setup once the actual questions and multichoices are worked out, and it would be a method of getting a true sense of what the current community actually thinks, it would also mean that everything is already broken down into the important aspects."

So, I found this quite a good idea. The By-laws committee has never been inclusive... I exhibited interest in it LONG before i was banned. It was actually suggested I sign up if I remember correctly.. 
I won't go into the gory details but as Dr D. said at the RIST conclusion... By-law represent the best chance to have my unjust ban rev.... Well even seriously looked at. There is nothing of the original ban that I have not been able to dismantle. 
So it would be fair to say, I am in a slowly increasing demographic who has more than most to gain from the By-Laws going through successfully... But I also am sitting here in my radical exclusion, watching those on the committee seemingly do nothing... ((I have hear rumour of a draft floating around  It's only been 5700ish hours.. and yeah mine took 40hrs to get to a rough draft... ))

Oh course it makes me laugh if you listen to 7:40... their requirements for the team I can hold my own in each of requirements... 

Also funny that at 10:50... they talk about the by-laws not being a "these are the rules for ever!" document. They should be malleable.  And yeah guess who put together a github repo for all the rules at Burn2 months ago.. It currently holds copies of ALL the currently rules.. Also my by laws.. And the 14,000 words worth fo documentation I wrote up for Burn2 after the data-breach... 


Burn2: By-Laws by survey...

Tainted: SL22B

This is an AI Generated Podcast based on two conversations with ChatGTP, which involved tens of thousands worth of words. The Sharing of entire support ticket threads and email chains with SL Executives. 
For Additional resources I also fed it the last 24 "Dense" videos from the main Second Life Youtube account. 
As Philip's Recent Talk at SL22B Talked a lot about inclusivity I very much focused on that, Where the issues are and what can be done about them.... 
At the moment I am emailing Brad, Patch, Phillip and Brett... I tracked my emails for the sake of my own sanity. ((Nothing worse than waiting on replies when you do not even know even the emails have been seen. )) As such I can say definitively that all my emails to them are opened usually multiple times... 
I have not received an email reply since March.... 

I did also make a official submission sharing this track using the official method..
https://feedback.secondlife.com/feature-requests/p/some-inclusivity-proposals-based-on-actual-user-experience
Will be interesting to see how long that stays active...

Second Life: Inclusivity

Talia Tokugawa

Related tracks