Name: Introducing Che The Emanoid by Talltaleheart
Duration: 3 min 51 s
Description: One of his emissaries announces Che's incarnation on Earth, and his guiding, enlightening principles.

With Cory Morningstar, Varun Mathur, Hiroyuki Hamada, Johan Eddebo and John Steppling. 

Relevant Links--

https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii92/articles/franco-moretti-dominique-pestre-bankspeak

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/its-kristallnacht-again-as-our-free?s=r

https://www.cfr.org/podcasts/japans-population-problem

https://www.governing.com/community/americas-demographic-winter

https://canadiandimension.com/articles/view/canadas-military-buildup-in-the-arctic-threatens-climate-and-indigenous-peoples

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/220427/dq220427a-eng.htm

https://www.eurasiareview.com/09032022-the-rise-of-global-fascism-and-end-of-world-as-we-know-it-oped/

https://mpr21.info/fue-el-ejercito-ucraniano-quien-cometio-la-matanza-de-bucha/

PODCAST #64

A Mark From Heaven (Bliss Doubt) .mp3

Fragile Heart

The Lord's Prayer

Da W0lf - Heaven(David Bowie Tribute) (bootleg)

Til Then

Da W0lf - Walk

9 PM Sunday Night

One of his emissaries announces Che's incarnation on Earth, and his guiding, enlightening principles.

Introducing Che The Emanoid

How come we have such different visceral reactions to the assertions “I am entitled to a house” and “I am immune in my house”, even though both entitlements and immunities are kinds of rights? Is it really a step forward that the UN has enumerated “rights” in an International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and an International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights? What are the practical effects of Locke’s and Rousseau’s thought-exercise propounding that man is a blank slate? Were our rights won for us by being asserted by our forefathers against government, or are they graciously granted by government and then curtailed and withheld again by that same government with a supposedly heavy heart?

How is it that the first time the phrase “human rights” was weaponised as a slogan was by sexual proclivity activists in the Weimar Republic organising as the “Human Rights League”, a century and a half after the coining of the term by philosophers? Why can an Englishman eject an intruder from his home but a Continental must wait for the police to turn up and do it for him? Is it sheer coincidence that Article 29 of Magna Carta 1215 seems to have been subverted by the same-numbered article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948, the so-called Global Magna Carta? Are rights truly about “fairness” or “equity” — or is that actually a swizz?

Join us to hear why David Scott argues that the twentieth-century rights discourse has made us “part-time slaves”; how “You can’t interfere with me” has degenerated into “The government must interfere with you because of my rights”; whether we even have a right to bodily integrity any more; how statutes as apparently innocuous as the Local Government Act 1888 hive off rights from us to government; what it means when Continental judges “set aside” their national laws and constitution because of a treaty ratified by their government; and what the lawyerly trick of conflating rights with powers involves. There is no better time to be discussing these questions than in 2020.

For an example of the thinking that we politely disagree with, this recent podcast on human rights may also be of interest to our listeners as they consider our current episode: it goes into detail on the mediaeval Christian background of “natural rights” but sadly skips over immunity from theft and harm, in its haste to assert equal entitlement to positive goods — thereby tragically forming the very pretext for such theft and harm by modern governments.

Introducing Che The Emanoid

Talltaleheart

Related tracks