世界

...the performance of the computer running on this network has an approximately infinitely-fast processing speed, and an infinite storage capacity.
Therefore, in theory, it is “omniscient and omnipotent,” but in practice, it is “nearly infinite, but not infinite,” and most of the data in its memory is “junk information,” so it seems there are limits to its capacity.
The junk information mentioned here is a large amount of “memories” and “records” experienced by hundreds of billions of people.
It is simply being stored, and has become a huge “load” on the network.

By the way, when we turn a human being into information, what do we define as the boundaries of that information?
A simple hypothesis is, since a human is a living organism, isn’t it genes?
Information on the Net, probably, because it is packetized, making the genes a “key,” to some extent, seems reasonable.
Since genes are kept in a certain part of every human cell, if you have a way to do so, you can easily trace it.
Since the sequence of genes is unique in each individual, so with them, it will also be possible to establish “individuality” on the net.
Get a specific gene, so that it can be completely scanned, and it will become a mass of “human” information.
By the way, assuming that a the PC of the Net’s ability is infinite, it will be able to maintain that information exactly for an infinite amount of time.
But, if that ability is limited, a kind of swap starts to happen, and the amount of time that information can be maintained for is limited.
Also, because of unavoidable generation of (so-called) quantum noise, when stored for any longer than a moment, complex information breaks down naturally.
In other words, if there is an available receptor, and if it is instantaneous, then there is a possibility of “moving the body” or “transferring personality” over the net, but if the entirety of “human” information is saved somewhere, it is “impossible” to move to a new body later

Megastructure

d3br1s