My favorite reading from the Creed Omnibus Submitted to the Adjudicator a few days ago in 
HRTO File 2025-64274-I [ROSE v. Amazon, Barnes and Noble, et al.] Taken from the larger work:
Subject File HRTO 2025-64274 I - THE OMNIBUS - SUBMISSIONS 1-10 - Creed Sincerity Submissions

https://archive.org/details/videodrome-channel-83/Subject+File+2025-64274-I+-+THE+OMNIBUS+-+SUBMISSIONS+1-10+-+Creed+Sincerity+Submissions.mp4

======================================================================
Actual real arguments used at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.
======================================================================
LYRICS:

Submission #7 – Refusal to Compromise as Evidence of Sincerity
File 2025-64274-I
December 13, 2025Registrar and parties,
The applicant’s refusal to alter core tenets of the creed—such as the use of the 
name “JESUS CHRIST” in publishing—despite permanent economic and personal 
consequences is the strongest possible evidence of subjective sincerity.
The Supreme Court of Canada in Syndicat Northcrest v. Amselem, 2004 SCC 47, at 
para. 50, established that sincerity is assessed by the believer’s genuine 
adherence, not by conformity to external norms. The Court emphasized that 
accommodation must respect the individual’s right to manifest belief without forced
compromise, even if the practice appears unconventional to others.
This principle was reaffirmed in Multani v. Commission scolaire 
Marguerite-Bourgeoys, 2006 SCC 6, where the Court held that requiring a Sikh 
student to remove his kirpan would compel compromise of a core religious practice, 
violating freedom of religion under s.2(a) of the Charter. The refusal to 
compromise was treated as proof of sincerity, not obstinacy.
In Trinity Western University v. Law Society of Upper Canada, 2018 SCC 33 (majority
and dissenting opinions), the Court grappled with institutional refusal to 
compromise on creed-based policies. The majority noted that forcing alteration of 
sincerely held beliefs to gain professional recognition constitutes discrimination,
while the dissent reinforced that minority religious communities cannot be required
to abandon core tenets for societal approval.
Lower tribunals have consistently followed this line. The HRTO in R.C. v. District 
School Board of Niagara, 2013 HRTO 1383, protected a non-mainstream spiritual 
practice without requiring the applicant to moderate or conceal it, finding refusal
to compromise indicative of sincerity.
The Ontario Court of Appeal in Ontario Human Rights Commission v. Christian 
Horizons, 2010 ONSC 2105 (Div Ct), upheld protection for creed-based practices that
conflicted with workplace norms, noting that compelled change of belief 
manifestation amounts to discrimination.
International precedent aligns. The European Court of Human Rights in Eweida v. 
United Kingdom (2013), no. 48420/10, protected an employee’s refusal to remove a 
cross, finding that requiring compromise of visible religious symbols violates 
Article 9 of the Convention.
The UN Human Rights Committee in General Comment No. 22 on Article 18 of the ICCPR 
(1993) states that freedom of religion includes the right to manifest belief 
without coercion to alter practices, and refusal to do so evidences sincerity.
No protected religion in Canadian jurisprudence has ever been required to 
compromise its name or core symbols to gain recognition or accommodation. To impose
such a requirement on this minority creed would establish discriminatory treatment 
under s.1 of the Code.
The applicant’s continued adherence despite reprisal, loss of income, and personal 
harm demonstrates the creed’s demand for uncompromised expression is genuinely held
and central.
Respectfully submitted,
Brendan S. Rose
Applicant (self-represented)

Submission #7 – APPLICANT!!! "Refusal to Compromise as Evidence of Sincerity"

A prolific artist, with over 1000 songs in my archives, a youtuber, a rumbler, an author of over 55 books, designer of LUCIFERIANISM on Steam and Epic. Notoriously censored due to my own behavior and extremely controversial music and other works. Father of a boy I have never met (I want to but I'm just not well enough, it's sad.) I am very talented and often achieve great things, but cycles of going from normalcy to mental breakdowns often result in me losing my accounts and platform access and thus my archives in vicious incidents of self destruction resulting in bans. For instance, I am banned from the Amazon and Barnes and Noble press duopoly for this reason, and thus banned from publishing books at all, outright.

MY FOREVER HOME: Archive.org
https://archive.org/search?query=creator%3A%22Brendan+S%2C+Rose%22

LUCIFERIANISM©️

by THE DEVIL 666

Available today on STEAM and EPIC GAMES STORE. #indiegames

It is an open world sandbox, roguelike, soulslike, set in a gargantuan maze of 300 individually constructed levels. Brutal difficulty. Fully voiced by Elevenlabs AI Voice Robots. Built in Unreal Engine 5.4.

[Rated M for Mature.]

STEAM:

https://store.steampowered.com/app/3990500/LUCIFERIANISM/

EPIC:

https://store.epicgames.com/en-US/p/luciferianism-300fc0

THE DEVIL 666 on Youtube
https://www.youtube.com/@BLOODREDGENERALWUKONG

THE DEVIL 666 on Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/c-4862779

BRENDAN ROSE on Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/brendan.s.rose/

Yeah here's the problem man, you go too far, and maybe say things you shouldn't, So you wanna censor those, and maybe you have a justification for doing that, maybe you have a good reason.

But then, 
You wanna censor this now, and that, and this, and that, and that one over there, and this one and that one and FUCKIN EVERYTHING NOW.

Suddenly everything is censored to shit, and no one can say anything without you destroying them.

THIS IS WHY THE LEFT IS TERRIBLE.

I have to look at my life story and say, oh, I have to cut 75% of my life story because of you, It doesn't make sense anymore, more holes than swiss cheese.

MUSIC GENRE(s): Horror, Synth-pop, Rock, 
Girlband Screamo, Comedy, Philosophy,
Religion and Theology, Politics, Truecrime

MY INFERNAL APOSTLES:
1: Styxhexenhammer666
2: Liana K
3: Scott Adams 
4: Vee Monro
5: Doug's Dharma
6: JordanOwen42/Jordan Peterson

I am the lamb who spake as a dragon

THEY WORSHIPPED THE DRAGON, FOR HE HAD GIVEN AUTHORITY TO THE BEAST, AND THEY WORSHIPPED THE BEAST SAYING "who is like the beast and who can fight against it?"

Ever since I was a child, I wanted to be the beast with two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon. I did not really expect to become him, but I did.

You will take the chip or die.

Those who die will live forever in heaven, though
those who take chip shall liveth forever on earth.
And never again shall they meet.

THE BEAST RELIGON
https://drive.proton.me/urls/QNPN2Z720W#7UrpVDmRPKOL

Submission #7 – APPLICANT!!! "Refusal to Compromise as Evidence of Sincerity"

EMPOWERED FEMINIST STOLE MY BABY (EFSMB)