Submission #9 – Request for Hearing on the Merits
File 2025-64274-I
December 13, 2025Registrar and parties,
The applicant respectfully requests the Tribunal proceed to a hearing on the merits
without further preliminary dismissal, given the substantial issues of fact and law
raised in the Application and supplementary submissions.
A hearing on the merits is required where genuine issues of discrimination and
reprisal exist that cannot be resolved on the papers alone, as established by the
Supreme Court of Canada in Syndicat Northcrest v. Amselem, 2004 SCC 47 at para. 2,
and reaffirmed in Multani v. Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys, 2006 SCC 6
at para. 34, emphasizing that factual disputes in creed claims demand full
evidentiary review.
The Tribunal must allow a hearing where the applicant has presented evidence
capable of supporting a finding of discrimination, as the Supreme Court held in
Trinity Western University v. Law Society of Upper Canada, 2018 SCC 33 at para. 19
(majority), and Loyola High School v. Quebec (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 12 at
para. 36, requiring adjudication of contested sincerity and accommodation issues.
Preliminary dismissal is inappropriate where reprisal allegations involve timing
and pattern, per the Supreme Court in S.L. v. Commission scolaire des Chênes, 2012
SCC 7 at para. 24, and the Ontario Court of Appeal in Ontario Human Rights
Commission v. Christian Horizons, 2010 ONSC 2105 (Div Ct) at para. 52, mandating
hearings for complex reprisal claims.
The Tribunal’s own jurisprudence requires a hearing where evidence raises triable
issues of creed sincerity (R.C. v. District School Board of Niagara, 2013 HRTO 1383
at para. 67; Jazairi v. Ontario (Human Rights Commission), 1999 CanLII 3511 (ON CA)
at para. 40), particularly when novel or minority beliefs are at stake.
Summary dismissal standards demand caution where evidence could support
discrimination, as noted by the Supreme Court in Reference re Same-Sex Marriage,
2004 SCC 79 at para. 22, and the Federal Court in Maurice v. Canada (Attorney
General), 2002 FCT 69 at para. 41, protecting non-traditional spiritual practices.
The applicant’s documented reprisal pattern—timed suppression, financial harm, and
physical threats—creates factual disputes requiring a hearing, consistent with Big
M Drug Mart Ltd., [1985] 1 S.C.R. 295 at para. 123, and Wall v. Judicial Committee
of the Highwood Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses, 2018 SCC 26 at para.
31.Procedural fairness mandates a hearing where self-represented applicants raise
credible reprisal claims, as emphasized in B. v. Ontario Human Rights Tribunal,
2015 HRTO 116 at para. 28, and Grant v. Canada (Attorney General), 2004 FC 153 at
para. 55.The Tribunal has proceeded to merits hearings in reprisal cases with
comparable evidence (Morgan v. Herman Miller Canada Inc., 2013 HRTO 650 at para.
45; Mucollari v. Il Gabbiano Ristorante, 2013 HRTO 393 at para. 38), underscoring
the need for full adjudication here.
Given the Supreme Court’s direction in Amselem, supra at para. 68, and Loyola,
supra at para. 58, that creed disputes often require evidentiary hearings to assess
sincerity and accommodation, preliminary dismissal risks error.
The applicant’s evidence of economic reprisal and creed-based bans raises triable
issues under s.8 and s.1 of the Code, warranting a merits hearing as in Monrose v.
Double Diamond, 2013 HRTO 1273 at para. 52.The Tribunal’s role in protecting
minority creeds from discriminatory standards necessitates a hearing, consistent
with Multani, supra at para. 34, and S.L., supra at para. 22.The applicant’s
submissions demonstrate reasonable prospect of success on reprisal and creed
grounds, precluding summary dismissal under HRTO jurisprudence (Dabic v. Windsor
Police Service, 2010 HRTO 1994 at para. 10; For [shortened]
Regards,
Brendan S. Rose
Applicant (self-represented)

My favorite song in a long time.....

Subject File 2025-64274-I - THE OMNIBUS - SUBMISSIONS 1-10 - Creed Sincerity Submissions

A prolific artist, with over 1000 songs in my archives, a youtuber, a rumbler, an author of over 55 books, designer of LUCIFERIANISM on Steam and Epic. Notoriously censored due to my own behavior and extremely controversial music and other works. Father of a boy I have never met (I want to but I'm just not well enough, it's sad.) I am very talented and often achieve great things, but cycles of going from normalcy to mental breakdowns often result in me losing my accounts and platform access and thus my archives in vicious incidents of self destruction resulting in bans. For instance, I am banned from the Amazon and Barnes and Noble press duopoly for this reason, and thus banned from publishing books at all, outright.

MY FOREVER HOME: Archive.org
https://archive.org/search?query=creator%3A%22Brendan+S%2C+Rose%22

LUCIFERIANISM©️

by THE DEVIL 666

Available today on STEAM and EPIC GAMES STORE. #indiegames

It is an open world sandbox, roguelike, soulslike, set in a gargantuan maze of 300 individually constructed levels. Brutal difficulty. Fully voiced by Elevenlabs AI Voice Robots. Built in Unreal Engine 5.4.

[Rated M for Mature.]

STEAM:

https://store.steampowered.com/app/3990500/LUCIFERIANISM/

EPIC:

https://store.epicgames.com/en-US/p/luciferianism-300fc0

THE DEVIL 666 on Youtube
https://www.youtube.com/@BLOODREDGENERALWUKONG

THE DEVIL 666 on Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/c-4862779

BRENDAN ROSE on Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/brendan.s.rose/

Yeah here's the problem man, you go too far, and maybe say things you shouldn't, So you wanna censor those, and maybe you have a justification for doing that, maybe you have a good reason.

But then, 
You wanna censor this now, and that, and this, and that, and that one over there, and this one and that one and FUCKIN EVERYTHING NOW.

Suddenly everything is censored to shit, and no one can say anything without you destroying them.

THIS IS WHY THE LEFT IS TERRIBLE.

I have to look at my life story and say, oh, I have to cut 75% of my life story because of you, It doesn't make sense anymore, more holes than swiss cheese.

MUSIC GENRE(s): Horror, Synth-pop, Rock, 
Girlband Screamo, Comedy, Philosophy,
Religion and Theology, Politics, Truecrime

MY INFERNAL APOSTLES:
1: Styxhexenhammer666
2: Liana K
3: Scott Adams 
4: Vee Monro
5: Doug's Dharma
6: JordanOwen42/Jordan Peterson

I am the lamb who spake as a dragon

THEY WORSHIPPED THE DRAGON, FOR HE HAD GIVEN AUTHORITY TO THE BEAST, AND THEY WORSHIPPED THE BEAST SAYING "who is like the beast and who can fight against it?"

Ever since I was a child, I wanted to be the beast with two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon. I did not really expect to become him, but I did.

You will take the chip or die.

Those who die will live forever in heaven, though
those who take chip shall liveth forever on earth.
And never again shall they meet.

THE BEAST RELIGON
https://drive.proton.me/urls/QNPN2Z720W#7UrpVDmRPKOL

Subject File 2025-64274-I - THE OMNIBUS - SUBMISSIONS 1-10 - Creed Sincerity Submissions

EMPOWERED FEMINIST STOLE MY BABY (EFSMB)