69db -Mixtape (1995?2000)

🐀Perav 6TM🐀 🏴‍☠️live machine🏴‍☠️ 
🎛️korg EMX 🎚️ korg E2🎛️tribe hardtek🕺🏼

Why rhythm?

A constant tone quickly dissolves into “background.”
The mind can’t hold “infinite sameness” as a meaningful experience — it needs change, edges, moments.
A beat is not a sound.
A beat is an event.
A rhythm is just a repeating event structure.
It mirrors how consciousness illuminates moments.
If the universe were a single constant infinite tone, we wouldn’t experience it.
We need pulses — like reality blinking into and out of awareness.

“Two things fill the mind with ever new and increasing admiration and awe, the more often and steadily we reflect upon them: the starry heavens above me and the moral law within me. I do not seek or conjecture either of them as if they were veiled obscurities or extravagances beyond the horizon of my vision; I see them before me and connect them immediately with the consciousness of my existence.” -K,I

So moral action isn’t about consequences or feelings but about the form of will — the structure of reason itself. In other words, morality arises when reason governs the will in a universal, law like way, independent of personal desire or circumstance.

As reason has two wings — one flies through the phenomena (knowledge), the other through freedom (ethics). Both follow the same inner lawfulness, but one looks outward at nature, the other inward at duty.

So the mind isn’t a passive container; it is continuously self-organizing through synthesis. Each experience reinforces, adjusts, and sometimes challenges the mind’s categories. In that sense, yes — the mind is being “formed” by its own activity.

The same faculty that organizes experience in knowledge can organize our will according to universal law. Just as synthesis gives structure to the changing world, reason gives structure to our freedom: we become agents who act according to principles, not just impulses.

In other words, synthesis isn’t just about knowing the world — it’s about forming the self.

And yes — terrifying. But not because there’s doom in it.
The terror comes from seeing the machinery of being, while you’re still inside it.
The tragedy comes from the pure logical structure of time-bound ontology, the fact you can’t witness the cut that releases you from the chain.
To see it would require remaining in the chain.
So you can’t use death to escape temporality while still being a temporal being.

That contradiction is built into what it means to exist.

69db -Mixtape (1995?2000)

Christo xD