In this episode of his "Clearly Conspicuous" podcast series, "Hidden Fees in the Live-Event Ticketing and Short-Term Lodging Industries," consumer protection attorney Anthony DiResta discusses the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) new rule targeting mandatory hidden fees and enhanced transparency in pricing disclosures. The rule, finalized after significant public feedback, specifically addresses the live-event ticketing and short-term lodging sectors, requiring businesses to include all mandatory fees in the prominently displayed total price. Although certain fees, such as government-imposed taxes and optional amenities, can be excluded, they must be clearly disclosed before purchase. Mr. DiResta emphasizes that though the rule currently targets only two industries, it reflects the FTC's broader intent to tackle deceptive pricing practices across various sectors.

For more, visit: https://hklaw.com/en/insights/media-entities/2025/01/podcast---hidden-fees-in-the-live-event-ticketing-and-short-term

Hidden Fees in the Live-Event Ticketing and Short-Term Lodging Industries

In this episode of "The Trial Lawyer’s Handbook" podcast, litigation attorney Dan Small describes the unnatural environment of the courtroom and the importance of preparing witnesses for the off-putting rhythm of testimony that he summarizes as "question, pause, answer, stop." In the corruption case United States v. Bert Lance, because the defense sought to call numerous character witnesses, the judge limited counsel to four legalistic questions. The most notable witness, Miss Lillian, the elderly mother of then-President Jimmy Carter, had known Lance his whole life and could have played a key role in his defense. However, she was not prepared for the unusual phrasing of the questions and, after an 18-hour flight to get to court, concluded her testimony in about two-and-a-half minutes. Mr. Small reminds the listeners that every witness is Miss Lillian and must be prepared accordingly.

Miss Lillian "Testifies": The Importance of Witness Preparation

En este episodio de "A Lo Legal En Par Minutos", Edwin Cortés, socio, y Kamila Pineda, abogada de derecho corporativo, conversan sobre la nueva Ley 2495 de 2025 en Colombia, que impulsa la creación de empresas familiares. Kamila enumera los requisitos para calificar como sociedad de familia – más del 50 por ciento del capital en manos de dos o más miembros del mismo núcleo familiar y que los ingresos brutos anuales encajen en la categoría de microempresa – y detalla los principales incentivos: exención de matrícula mercantil ante la Cámara de Comercio, acceso más ágil a créditos y la creación del "Sello Hecho en Familia" para reconocer productos y servicios de estas sociedades. Añade que el gobierno tiene seis meses para definir beneficios adicionales para quienes que consuman, promuevan o comercialicen bienes y servicios con este sello. Finalmente, aclara que ya es posible constituir sociedades de familia y empezar usando el Sello Hecho en Familia.

Entre afectos y acciones: Nueva ley para sociedades de familia

In the first part of this special guest episode of "The Trial Lawyer's Handbook" podcast series, litigation attorney Dan Small is joined by Partner Eric Alexander, who leads the firm's Product Liability – Life Sciences Team. Mr. Small talks with Mr. Alexander about the transition from being in the back row of a trial team to having a stand-up role. After reflecting on the beginning of his legal career, Mr. Alexander offers advice for young litigators on how to prepare for a trial and how to best support the attorneys on your team, plus some important don'ts to avoid in the courtroom. Mr. Alexander also emphasizes that there is no one way to approach a trial. Taking an approach that fits your case and fits who you are is important and will help you to come across as genuine.

Part I - Going from Young Associate to Veteran Lawyer

In this episode of "Clearly Conspicuous," consumer protection attorney Anthony DiResta unpacks a recent update in Trump v. Slaughter, in which the U.S. Supreme Court issued a stay allowing President Donald Trump's removal of Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter to stand while the case makes its way through the appeals process. He previews full arguments in December of this year that could revisit – and even overturn – Humphrey's Executor. Mr. DiResta explains the FTC's origins, structure and independence, as well as the 1935 precedent set in Humphrey's Executor limiting presidential removal of FTC commissioners. He additionally reviews Justice Elena Kagan's dissent in the court's order and analyzes how the move signals a potential recalibration of separation of powers. The episode outlines far-reaching implications if removal protections are narrowed: greater presidential control over independent agencies (FTC, National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB)), reduced institutional independence, more litigation over "for cause" standards and broader precedent shifts affecting agency governance. The discussion closes with key questions for businesses and counsel to monitor as the future of the FTC, and independent commissions more broadly, may be shaped by the court's forthcoming decision.


The Future of the FTC: in the Hands of the Supreme Court

In this episode of "The Trial Lawyer’s Handbook" podcast, litigation attorney Dan Small discusses the value of observing and learning from experienced colleagues, both professionally and socially. He reflects on one of his first significant cases as a federal prosecutor, when the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) secured a grand jury indictment in Atlanta against Bert Lance, the former director of the Office of Management and Budget, and three associates on charges that they conspired to violate U.S. banking laws to obtain millions of dollars in loans. Mr. Small joined the DOJ team led by Ed Tomko and Marvin Loewy and learned from watching them and the opposing counsel in action.

Learn from the Masters

In the second part of this special guest episode of "The Trial Lawyer's Handbook" podcast series, litigation attorney Dan Small is once again joined by Partner Eric Alexander, who leads the firm's Product Liability – Life Sciences Team. This episode's conversation focuses on product liability trials and how they differ from other types of litigation, as well as recent shifts in juror attitudes and the effects on expert witness selection and preparation.  Mr. Small shares an anecdote to emphasize that getting the jury to like you isn't just a part of trial, it's the only part of trial. For his part, Mr. Alexander suggests that changes in juror dynamics were likely accelerated by COVID-19 and the associated shutdowns. The attorneys agree that a strong expert nowadays is defined more by the ability to speak "juror's English" than by degrees or professional experience. The dialogue offers a behind-the-scenes look into the world of product liability litigation and the factors that can determine success in the courtroom.

Part II - Recent Changes in Jury Dynamics and How to Prepare Your Expert Accordingly

In this episode of "The Trial Lawyer's Handbook," litigation attorney Dan Small explains why simplifying a complex case is essential to persuading a jury. Recalling the federal prosecution of U.S. budget director Bert Lance, Mr. Small describes how large investigations can produce lengthy indictments that confuse rather than convince, and emphasizes that focusing on clear, provable charges can strengthen a case. He outlines the risks of overcomplication and the importance of telling a straightforward story that a juror can follow.

Clarity Over Complexity at Trial

In this episode of "The Trial Lawyer's Handbook" podcast, litigation attorney Dan Small explores the complexity of federal corruption cases. He highlights a matter he handled as an assistant U.S. attorney in the Boston U.S. Attorney's Office Public Corruption Unit: a case in Brockton, Massachusetts, in which the IRS uncovered corrupt relationships between contractors and Frank Wallen, the city's superintendent of sewers and then-commissioner of public works. Mr. Small shares insights into how the case arose, what work his team focused on and why it was so difficult to prosecute.

The Challenge of Corruption

En este episodio de "A Lo Legal En Par Minutos", Edwin Cortés, socio, y Jonathan Sánchez, abogado del área de litigios, analizan el Decreto 768 de 2025, por el cual se reglamenta parcialmente el Código Nacional de Seguridad y Convivencia Ciudadana. Éste busca mejorar el sistema y la forma en que se adelantan los procesos policiales, ya sea a partir de querellas interpuestas por particulares o iniciados por entidades públicas. Los abogados explican en qué consiste la mejora del procedimiento, qué es una queja o una querella, y qué es el Registro Nacional de Medidas Correctivas.

Orden en el procedimiento de querellas: El giro del Decreto 768 de 2025

On the first episode of "The Tack Room," Partner Kayla Pragid, founder and chair of Holland & Knight's Equine Industry Team, joins Public Affairs Advisor Tori Deal for a conversation with Holland & Knight-sponsored rider Kara Lindenberger and Lindsay Barrack, who owns and works as a trainer at Mahan Farm. Along with covering the path to an equine career, the hosts trace Ms. Lindenberger's journey from 4-H and "backyard" riding to eventing, including transforming a difficult mustang into a pony safe for children and setting sights on the American Eventing Championships with her young mare, Stella.​ Ms. Barrack discusses building a barn business from the ground up, mentorship and the power of asking questions. Together, they unpack training philosophies, day-to-day routines and confidence-building strategies that help riders progress thoughtfully, providing a way to turn passion, persistence and smart planning into real results.

Hidden Fees in the Live-Event Ticketing and Short-Term Lodging Industries

Holland & Knight Legal Podcast