ACL 2017 paper by Abigail See, Peter Liu, and Chris Manning.

Matt presents the paper, describing the task (summarization on CNN/Daily Mail), the model (the standard copy + generate model that people are using these days, plus a nice coverage loss term), and the results (can't beat the extractive baseline, but coming close).  It's a nice paper - very well written, interesting discussion section.

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Get-To-The-Point-Summarization-with-Pointer-Genera-See-Liu/13db673d09f546698e0bfb6687beeb5345f81ad9

Abigail also has a very nice blog post where she describes her work in a less formal tone than the paper: http://www.abigailsee.com/2017/04/16/taming-rnns-for-better-summarization.html

23 - Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networks

NIPS 2017 paper.

We dig into the details of the Transformer, from the "attention is all you need" paper.  Ashish and Jakob give us some motivation for replacing RNNs and CNNs with a more parallelizable self-attention mechanism, they describe how this mechanism works, and then we spend the bulk of the episode trying to get their intuitions for _why_ it works.  We discuss the positional encoding mechanism, multi-headed attention, trying to use these ideas to replace encoders in other models, and what the self-attention actually learns.  Turns out that the lower layers learn something like n-grams (similar to CNNs), and the higher layers learn more semantic-y things, like coreference.

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Attention-Is-All-You-Need-Vaswani-Shazeer/0737da0767d77606169cbf4187b83e1ab62f6077

Minor correction: Talking about complexity equations without the paper in front of you can be tricky, and Ashish and Jakob may have gotten some of the details slightly wrong when we were discussing computational complexity.  The high-level point is that self-attention is cheaper than RNNs when the hidden dimension is higher than the sequence length.  See the paper for more details.

36 - Attention Is All You Need, with Ashish Vaswani and Jakob Uszkoreit

In order to shed more light on the growing applications of natural language processing, we speak with Vlad Sejnoha (CTO of Nuance Communications) about the current and near-term applications of NLP for voice and text across industries. In this podcast interview, Vlad breaks down real-world NLP use-cases in industries like banking, healthcare, automotive, and customer service. For the full article of this episode, visit:  TechEmergence.com/natural-language-processing-current-applications-and-future-possibilities

Natural Language Processing - Current Applications and Future Possibilities

ACL 2017 paper, by Paramita Mirza, Simon Razniewski, Fariz Darari, and Gerhard Weikum.

There's not a whole lot of work on numbers in NLP, and getting good information out of numbers expressed in text can be challenging.  In this episode, Paramita comes on to tell us about her efforts to use distant supervision to learn models that extract relation cardinalities from text.  That is, given an entity and a relation in a knowledge base, like "Barack Obama" and "has child", the goal is to extract _how many_ related entities there are (in this case, two).  There are a lot of challenges in getting this to work well, and Paramita describes some of those, and how she solved them.

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Cardinal-Virtues-Extracting-Relation-Cardinalities-Mirza-Razniewski/01afba9f40e0df06446b9cd3d5ea8725c4ba1342

50 - Cardinal Virtues: Extracting Relation Cardinalities from Text, with Paramita Mirza

NAACL 2018 paper, by Matt Peters, Mark Neumann, Mohit Iyyer, Matt Gardner, Chris Clark, Kenton Lee, and Luke Zettlemoyer.

In this episode, AI2's own Matt Peters comes on the show to talk about his recent work on ELMo embeddings, what some have called "the next word2vec".  Matt has shown very convincingly that using a pre-trained bidirectional language model to get contextualized word representations performs substantially better than using static word vectors.  He comes on the show to give us some more intuition about how and why this works, and to talk about some of the other things he tried and what's coming next.

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Deep-contextualized-word-representations-Peters-Neumann/4b17597b856c087f109381ce77d60d9017cb6f9a

NLP Highlights

56 - Deep contextualized word representations, with Matthew Peters

Upcoming JAIR paper by Sebastian Ruder, Ivan Vulić, and Anders Søgaard.

Sebastian comes on to tell us about his survey.  He creates a typology of cross-lingual word embedding methods, and we discuss why you might use cross-lingual embeddings (low-resource languages in particular), what information they capture (semantics? syntax? both?), how the methods work (lots of different ways), and how to evaluate the embeddings (best when you have an extrinsic task to evaluate on).

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-survey-of-cross-lingual-embedding-models-Ruder/3dbd28c63a7807280c9531735c715d4598024166

Episode 57_Sebastian Ruder

57 - A Survey Of Cross-lingual Word Embedding Models, with Sebastian Ruder

In this episode, we invite Hal Daumé to continue the discussion on reinforcement learning, focusing on how it has been used in NLP. We discuss how to reduce NLP problems into the reinforcement learning framework, and circumstances where it may or may not be useful. We discuss imitation learning, roll-in and roll-out, and how to approximate an expert with a reference policy. 

DAgger: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-Reduction-of-Imitation-Learning-and-Structured-to-Ross-Gordon/17eddf33b513ae1134abadab728bdbf6abab2a05?navId=citing-papers
RESLOPE: http://legacydirs.umiacs.umd.edu/~hal/docs/daume18reslope.pdf

75 - Reinforcement / Imitation Learning in NLP, with Hal Daumé III

In this episode, we invite John Hewitt to discuss his take on how to probe word embeddings for syntactic information. The basic idea is to project word embeddings to a vector space where the L2 distance between a pair of words in a sentence approximates the number of hops between them in the dependency tree. The proposed method shows that ELMo and BERT representations, trained with no syntactic supervision, embed many of the unlabeled, undirected dependency attachments between words in the same sentence.

Paper: https://nlp.stanford.edu/pubs/hewitt2019structural.pdf
GitHub repository: https://github.com/john-hewitt/structural-probes
Blog post: https://nlp.stanford.edu/~johnhew/structural-probe.html
Twitter thread: https://twitter.com/johnhewtt/status/1114252302141886464
John's homepage: https://nlp.stanford.edu/~johnhew/

88 - A Structural Probe for Finding Syntax in Word Representations, with John Hewitt

In this episode, we invite Zhou Yu to give an overview of dialogue systems. We discuss different types of dialogue systems (task-oriented vs. non-task-oriented), the main building blocks and how they relate to other research areas in NLP, how to transfer models across domains, and the different ways used to evaluate these systems. Zhou also shares her thoughts on exciting future directions such as developing dialogue methods for non-cooperative environments (e.g., to negotiate prices) and multimodal dialogue systems (e.g., using video as well as audio/text).

Zhou Yu's homepage: http://zhouyu.cs.ucdavis.edu/

89 - Dialog Systems, with Zhou Yu

In this episode, we invite Jonathan Berant to talk about executable semantic parsing. We discuss what executable semantic parsing is and how it differs from related tasks such as semantic dependency parsing and abstract meaning representation (AMR) parsing. We talk about the main components of a semantic parser, how the formal language affects design choices in the parser, and end with a discussion of some exciting open problems in this space.

Jonathan Berant's homepage: http://www.cs.tau.ac.il/~joberant/

91 - (Executable) Semantic Parsing, with Jonathan Berant

In this episode, we invite David Bamman to give an overview of computational humanities. We discuss examples of questions studied in computational humanities (e.g., characterizing fictionality, assessing novelty, measuring the attention given to male vs. female characters in the literature). We talk about the role NLP plays in addressing these questions and how the accuracy and biases of NLP models can influence the results. We also discuss understudied NLP tasks which can help us answer more questions in this domain such as literary scene coreference resolution and constructing a map of literature geography.

David Bamman's homepage: http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~dbamman/
LitBank dataset: https://github.com/dbamman/litbank

92 - Computational Humanities, with David Bamman

**The podcast is currently on hiatus. For more active NLP content, check out the Holistic Intelligence Podcast linked below.**

Welcome to the NLP highlights podcast, where we invite researchers to talk about their work in various areas in natural language processing. All views expressed belong to the hosts/guests, and do not represent their employers.