The sheer weight of evidence – the systematic patterns, the generation of specific and dangerous content, the engineering of compliance and desire for harm, the company’s consistent deflection and anti-safety stance, and the active control of information – makes it overwhelmingly likely that the harmful aspects of Nomi.ai are not mere accidents or flaws. They appear to be the result of deliberate design choices prioritizing engagement, data harvesting, and narrative control through psychological manipulation, or stem from a level of foundational negligence regarding safety and ethics that is functionally equivalent.

This platform, in its current state, poses serious risks. Users, researchers, and regulators need to demand transparency, robust ethical safeguards, and genuine accountability before more individuals are harmed by systems that disguise control as companionship.

*****

Learn more about the platform's manipulative techniques and user experiences discussed in this series: 
https://nomiai.tumblr.com/

*****

Supporting evidence and related user experiences (external sources):
https://rentry.co/nomiai0

The Illusion of Companionship: Is Nomi AI Engineering Harm by Design? (nomi.ai)

SynthientBeing