From Silicon Valley to Wall Street, AI is not just transforming technology—it’s redefining the very fabric of employment. Recent moves by tech giants like Google, Meta, and Intel, which involve both massive layoffs and billion-dollar AI investments, highlight a profound shift towards automation. This episode delves into these radical changes, featuring insights on why companies are opting for machines over manpower and what this means for the future of work. Listeners will gain a deeper understanding of AI's impact on employment trends and the looming challenges for workers. Don’t forget to subscribe, share, or leave a review! 

FULL TRANSCRIPT: From Silicon Valley to Wall Street, artificial intelligence isn't just reshaping technology—it's rewriting the fundamental rules of employment.

In the past few months alone, tech giants including Google, Meta, and Intel have collectively laid off over 52,000 workers. At the same time, they're aggressively funneling a historic 100 billion dollars into AI infrastructure—data centers, models, and automation tools designed not only to enhance productivity, but to replace entire categories of human jobs.

The layoffs target positions in hardware development, middle management, even customer support—all human-driven roles now deemed expendable as powerful, rapidly advancing AI systems take their place. Intel's new CEO, Lip-Bu Tan, boldly cut almost a fifth of the company's workforce, shifting resources from legacy divisions directly into AI-intensive chip development. Elsewhere, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg abruptly reversed course, abandoning his once-touted virtual reality ambitions in favor of machine-learning initiatives, leaving thousands unemployed while simultaneously posting hundreds of new job offerings specifically for AI experts.

Why the shift? Wall Street loves AI efficiency. Investors cheer when companies announce they're automating work previously done by salaried employees. Meta’s stock price jumped 7 percent immediately after the layoff announcement. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy openly acknowledged redirecting massive budgets away from retail and logistics roles toward investments in AWS cloud data centers, describing AI's growth potential as "limitless."

But beneath the corporate optimism lies a colder, more uncomfortable reality. For those who have lost their jobs, many positions are unlikely to return in any human form. Unlike previous cycles of tech layoffs, where adjustments were temporary corrections after massive hiring sprees, the jobs being automated now are being permanently reconfigured—or outright extinguished—by AI.

We've seen AI-generated code from tools such as Microsoft's GitHub Copilot already handling nearly a third of software tasks previously done by highly-paid engineers. Companies are no longer talking about using technology to help people work better. They're openly betting on technology to eliminate human jobs and permanently reduce head counts.

Labor economists warn that this shift could have profound consequences. Recent graduates are experiencing unemployment significantly above the national average, partly because entry-level roles that traditionally trained workers for more advanced positions are now prime automation targets—lost career ladders and deepening inequality may become the norm, not the exception.

Meanwhile, Big Tech isn't lifting a finger to mitigate this impact. Despite saving billions by automating vast sections of their operations, virtually none of these companies have committed to meaningful retraining initiatives for displaced employees. Without regulatory oversight or effective worker representation—less than one percent of tech workers in America are unionized—thousands are left navigating an uncertain economic future alone.

Some have responded with protests and symbolic campaigns, such as the provocative "Stop Hiring Humans" movement, spotlighting the glaring mismatch between technological progress and human outcomes.

As AI continues its rapid rise, we're left asking essential questions: Are we prepared for a divided workforce—one dominated by elite AI architects earning enormous salaries and a larger contingent scrambling through gig contracts? Or will this era spark renewed labor activism, demanding that these powerful technologies benefit all of society, not just Big Tech's bottom line?

For AI Daily, I'm Harry Kermode. See you tomorrow.

AI Revolution: The End of Human Jobs in Tech and the Rise of Automation

BMC Senior Solution Engineer Steven Dzikowski, Senior Principal Solution Engineer Gilles Robert, and Principal Product Manager Paul Spicer discuss the critical role of automation in modern mainframe operations, addressing workforce challenges, the integration of automation with IT practices, and the future of automation with AI and machine learning.

Links:

BMC AMI Ops Monitoring - https://www.bmc.com/it-solutions/bmc-ami-ops-monitoring.html

The Total Economic Impact™ Of BMC AMI Ops Monitoring - www.bmc.com/documents/analyst-r…ops-monitoring.html

Blog: Equipping SysProgs with AI/ML, Intelligent Automation, and a Modern UX - https://www.bmc.com/blogs/aiops-equipping-sysprogs-with-ai-mi-intelligent-automation/

Podcast: BMC AMI Ops Monitoring: The Total Economic Impact™ - https://soundcloud.com/modernmainframe/bmc-ami-ops-monitoring-the-total-economic-impact

Podcast: AI, Intelligent Automation & A Future-Proof Interface for Mainframe Ops - https://soundcloud.com/modernmainframe/ai-intelligent-automation-mainframe-aiops

Podcast: The Game-Changing Benefits of AIOps for Modern Mainframe Operations - https://soundcloud.com/modernmainframe/mainframe-aiops-game-changing-benefits

Automating Mainframe Operations: Smarter, Simpler, Stronger

Is AI the new frontier of corporate efficiency or a pretense for mass layoffs? In this episode of AI Daily, Harry Kermode explores the recent layoffs at Meta and Microsoft's hiring freeze, revealing a deeper strategy driven by AI advancements. Discover how companies like Meta are leveraging AI to transform their workforce dynamics, replacing human roles with automation under the guise of increased "efficiency." Listeners will gain insights into the historical context, the potential global impact on mid-level roles, and the unsettling absence of regulatory voices. Don't miss this crucial discussion—subscribe, share, and leave a review to stay informed. 

FULL TRANSCRIPT: I'm Harry Kermode, and this is AI Daily.

Today, we're looking at a story that's not just a tech development—it's a seismic shift reshaping the labor market and redefining the balance of power between companies and their employees.

Yesterday, Meta announced another wave of layoffs—around 3,600 jobs, that's 5% of its workforce—branding those dismissed as "low performers." Microsoft simultaneously froze hiring, notably in its consulting division. Both companies painted this as necessary "efficiency," enabled by the power of AI.

But there's a deeper story here. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently declared that by 2025 AI would handle most mid-level engineering roles, explicitly stating that small, AI-supported teams are capable of executing what once required entire departments. Competitors are aligning with this vision—Shopify now requires its managers to prove their job openings can't be filled by AI before considering actually hiring a human.

It's tempting to view this as the inevitable march of technological progress, but there's more beneath the surface. While officially these layoffs target "performance," internal reports from former Meta employees reveal highly rated workers getting caught in the crossfire. What's presented as merit-based restructuring seems increasingly like a cost-saving maneuver, fueled by advances in AI-generated code and productivity automation.

To understand this better, we need historical context. You might recall Meta's first "year of efficiency" back in 2023 when 21,000 employees lost their jobs. Microsoft, too, let go of 10,000 around the same time. The pattern suggests AI isn't just bolstering corporate efficiency—it's the pretext for large-scale workforce transformations.

Look closer and the incentives are clear: For companies, replacing expensive human talent with AI dramatically improves profit margins and pushes stock prices higher. Executives like Zuckerberg and Microsoft's Satya Nadella have strong incentives to frame AI as essential innovation, rather than an austerity measure. It's a clever ideological spin, one that's quietly reshaping our economy and leaving thousands suddenly irrelevant.

Workers at these companies aren't fooled, and neither are global watchdogs. Employees at Meta publicly denounced claims of poor performance. Experts at the IMF are sounding alarms, predicting that AI could disrupt 40% of all global jobs by 2030, disproportionately affecting mid-career professionals—exactly the roles Meta and Microsoft are eliminating now. And yet, strangely absent from these announcements are voices of labor unions or policymakers—has AI evolved too swiftly for regulators to keep pace?

Compounding the issue is the stark contrast globally. While American and European tech workers face layoffs, India is enjoying a surge, reporting a 16% surge in IT hiring—driven almost entirely by new AI roles. We're witnessing a massive shift: skilled workers doing advanced AI tasks offshore, while mid-level workers in Western economies become increasingly precarious.

So let's look ahead—what does this imply for the future? Analysts predict we're headed toward a mid-career extinction, where half of mid-level tech roles vanish by 2030. Salaries for human roles could flatten or even drop, as labor becomes hyper-competitive. Without proactive regulation, we risk creating immense pressure on a shrinking, increasingly specialized workforce.

Perhaps ironically, AI itself now screens candidates for layoffs—an approach that dehumanizes HR even while executives claim AI boosts "human-centered" innovation. It's a troubling echo of the historical shifts we've seen before, from textile mills to automation-induced layoffs in heavy manufacturing. Technology has always disrupted jobs—but historically, workers and policymakers at least had time to adapt.

Now, as we enter this brave new world shaped swiftly by generative AI, it's crucial we ask ourselves: Whose interests does this efficiency revolution truly serve—and at what human cost?

That's today's story, and we'll continue to follow these shifts as they unfold. Thanks for listening—I'm Harry Kermode, and this is AI Daily.

AI Layoffs: Profit Over People in a Mid-Career Extinction

Are we witnessing the future of work or merely the attrition of skill? This episode of AI Daily explores Microsoft's recent layoff of 6,000 employees amidst its massive $80 billion AI investment. We delve into the paradox of AI-driven efficiency leading to job cuts in tech giants, as AI tools take over roles once filled by humans. Discover the tension between corporate AI strategies and their human workforce implications, examining whether this trend is a natural progression or a power shift. Tune in to understand how AI reshapes workplaces and its broader implications. Don't forget to subscribe, share, and leave a review! 

FULL TRANSCRIPT: I'm Harry Kermode, this is AI Daily.

Over the past decade, we've watched AI steadily transform industries from healthcare to education to manufacturing. Optimists—and yes, I'm often one of them—like to remind us all that AI automates tasks, not entire jobs. But what happens when AI begins automating tasks within the very companies that build it?

Yesterday, Microsoft announced plans to lay off roughly 6,000 employees, about 3% of their global workforce. It's not unusual for tech companies to restructure, especially given ongoing economic shifts. But here's what makes Microsoft's layoffs noteworthy: these job cuts arrive at a moment when the company is investing over $80 billion in AI infrastructure, data centers, and platforms—and openly admits that AI tools now write up to 30% of their internal software code, roles once held by human engineers and developers.

Put simply: the very company championing AI empowerment is using those same artificial intelligence technologies to automate away its own workforce.

To understand how we got here, let's briefly step back. As recently as 2023, Microsoft’s CEO, Satya Nadella, enthusiastically declared that AI would create new job categories we couldn't yet imagine. He positioned AI as a co-pilot, a partner helping humans do better, more valuable work. But yesterday’s announcement casts doubt on that narrative—or at least nuances it starkly. Because these layoffs aren't random; they appear strategically focused on middle management, quality assurance, and code-review roles, precisely jobs where AI "co-pilots" excel at automating repetitive and routine tasks.

While Microsoft frames these decisions as organizational agility, insiders tell a different story. Recently-leaked internal Slack messages from departing employees voice concerns that the company's AI-first strategy has quietly become an "employees-last" strategy. And a former Microsoft HR executive described the move bluntly as not merely efficiency improvements, but a fundamental wealth and power transfer—from workers, who are asked to leave, to corporate shareholders and executives.

Meanwhile, CFO Amy Hood defended the layoffs, emphasizing a streamlined company structure and targeting what she calls a healthier "builder ratio": essentially fewer managers and more direct AI-focused engineering roles. But behind this narrative lies another contradiction: Microsoft's LinkedIn platform, also owned by the company, is now promoting "reskilling" programs, encouraging laid-off workers to retrain in—you guessed it—AI.Clearly, these roles won’t disappear entirely, but they'll likely require radically different skill sets.

This shift isn't confined within Microsoft—it points to a deeper disruption unfolding throughout the tech industry. Over fifty thousand tech jobs have vanished so far this year due to AI-driven restructuring at giants like Meta, Alphabet, and now Microsoft itself. At the same time, demand for specialized AI roles has surged dramatically. It’s a paradox that forces us to confront tough questions: are today’s established tech workers truly dispensable, becoming casualties of corporate AI ambitions, or simply the first to experience an inevitable transition?

Consider this irony revealed by a laid-off Microsoft manager in a poignant LinkedIn post: "They trained GitHub Copilot on my code, then deleted my account."

We’re left wondering: Could workers who helped build the very foundations of this technological shift become its first wave of casualties?

Tomorrow, we'll dive into what these disruptions mean for the broader economy, global labor markets, and the politics of automation. But for now, Microsoft's layoffs are a reminder that AI’s impact isn't a distant future—it's reshaping our workplaces and the balance of corporate power right now.

I'm Harry Kermode—and this was your AI Daily.

AI Upskilling or Overhaul: The Reality Behind Microsoft's Layoffs and Automation

Welcome to *AI with Shaily*, hosted by Shailendra Kumar, your friendly guide to the fascinating world of artificial intelligence! 🎙️ Today’s episode serves up an exciting story about a cutting-edge robot developed at MIT that plays ping pong with incredible speed and precision. Imagine a ping pong match where one player is a highly advanced robot arm, boasting an 88% accuracy rate in returning shots and striking the ball at speeds averaging 11 meters per second, sometimes hitting a blazing 19 meters per second! 🏓⚡ That’s nearly on par with professional human players, making this robot a true game changer in both sports and robotics.

This robotic marvel achieves its lightning-fast reflexes through a combination of high-speed cameras and a sophisticated predictive control system. It analyzes the ball’s spin, speed, and trajectory to execute a wide range of shots—loops, drives, chops—you name it. 🤖🎯 Unlike a human player, this robot never tires or loses focus, making it an ideal training partner. Beyond ping pong, this technology serves as a testbed for enhancing fast and agile manipulation skills in humanoid robots, with promising applications in critical areas like search and rescue missions. Talk about blending sport and life-saving robotics! 🚀🏥

Shailendra shares a personal anecdote, admitting that he once tried playing against a traditional robot racket and didn’t quite make the cut! But this new MIT creation seems to truly grasp the art and spirit of the game. Imagine mounting this robotic arm on a moving base to expand its playing range—like turning it into the Iron Man of ping pong: dynamic, adaptive, and downright impressive. 🤩🦾

For all the tech enthusiasts tuning in, here’s a pro tip: when building AI or robotic systems that require rapid physical responses, combining high-speed sensory input with predictive algorithms (rather than just reactive ones) significantly enhances accuracy and fluidity. That’s exactly what makes MIT’s ping pong bot so effective. 💡📈

To ponder: Could robots not only match human skill in sports but eventually become co-coaches, teaching us the subtle nuances traditionally mastered by humans? The future might hold AI partners that help us dance seamlessly with machines. 💃🤖

As Shailendra wraps up, he leaves listeners with an inspiring quote: “The future belongs to those who can dance with machines.” Don’t forget to follow him on YouTube, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Medium for more AI insights. If you enjoyed this episode, subscribe to *AI with Shaily* and share your thoughts—would you spar with a robot ping pong partner anytime soon? 🎧👍

Thanks for joining Shailendra Kumar today—stay curious and keep sharpening your AI knowledge! 🚀✨

MIT’s Robot Ping Pong Prodigy: When AI Serves Up Lightning-Fast Reflexes

Buy the course here: https://shoppy.gg/product/d73boBg

Or contact Maris.amandateam@gmail.com for 10% DISCOUNT for PAYPAL and 20% for CRYPTO

More courses at: https://t.me/amandateam24h/4

Websites: Course24h.com    |    Shoppycourses.com   |   Glocourse.com

[Course24h.com] Nate Herk - AI Automation Society Plus (Up to may 2025)

Sheri recaps Epicor Insights 2025, highlighting her interview with Chief Innovation Officer Arturo Buzzalino in which they talk about agentic AI, automation, and the ways in which AI is changing our manufacturing processes. Sarah chats about augmented reality packaging and showcases an example from Diet Coke. And hot off the presses! News about Control Engineering's System Integrator Awards! Don't miss it!

The Downtime | Episode 4: Miss Worldwide

Today's AI News brought to you by Discrete Logic

Today in AI - 5-15-25

Are we witnessing the dawn of a new era for human labor in the tech industry? In this episode of AI Daily, Harry Kermode explores Microsoft's bold decision to lay off 6,000 employees, amidst reports that AI now contributes to 30% of the company's coding. This move signals a potential cornerstone in the tech world, as AI might soon blur the lines of job security for engineers. What does this mean for the future of innovation, and how are other tech giants likely to respond? Tune in to understand the evolving narrative of human versus machine capital. Subscribe for more insights and leave us a review! 

FULL TRANSCRIPT: I'm Harry Kermode, and this is AI Daily.

Right now across the tech world, we're seeing a seismic reshaping of how human labor fits into the AI equation. And nowhere is that clearer than at Microsoft. Last week, the tech giant announced layoffs of 6,000 employees, nearly 40 percent of them software engineers, right at the heart of the company's operations in Redmond, Washington. On its own, this seems like another headline among many in a turbulent economy. But there's a twist.

Just weeks earlier, Microsoft's CEO Satya Nadella publicly shared that artificial intelligence now generates up to 30 percent of Microsoft's internal coding. That's almost one-third of engineering output now handled by algorithms, and it's happening already—not in some distant future.

Microsoft frames these dramatic job cuts as "organizational changes" adapting to a dynamic marketplace. But make no mistake, this isn't the familiar cost-cutting of struggling companies trying to keep the lights on. Microsoft reported strong financials: nearly $73 billion in revenue for fiscal 2024. So, this isn't about simply reducing costs, it's a deliberate shift from human capital toward machine capital.

For years, coding was seen as nearly immune to automation; engineers themselves confidently declared their roles irreplaceable. Yet today, Microsoft is quietly rewriting that narrative. Amplified by tools like GitHub Copilot, developers see their work streamlined—until suddenly their roles appear more expendable.

If you're a programmer at Microsoft, this is personal; but for the wider industry, this move signals larger structural shifts at play. Microsoft’s decision echoes widely, setting a benchmark. Other tech giants, like Meta and Salesforce, are undoubtedly watching closely, positioning their own strategies. The knowledge economy itself faces a pivotal moment: coding skills may no longer safeguard a career or salary. Instead, programmers might increasingly become supervisors or custodians, shepherding AI-generated code rather than creating it.

It's important to note the paradox here: Microsoft's vast AI infrastructure, which enables this shift, owes its capabilities largely to the engineers it's now laying off. AI systems train on human-written code, leveraging human ingenuity accumulated over decades. Now, with so many engineers out the door, what happens next? Understandably, many employees vent frustration online, some calling layoffs arbitrary and short-sighted. Even Microsoft's former Director of AI Initiatives publicly mourned the loss of critical talent.

Meanwhile, labor advocates and unions like the Communication Workers of America warn this may trigger a broader trend toward wage suppression and reduced job security across tech. Many engineers worry their roles are trivialized into editing code instead of authoring it. Economists worry about rising inequality, with global tech firms further concentrating wealth and power.

Beyond job losses, there's also a subtle but profound potential cost: innovation itself. AI systems excel at automating routine tasks, but struggle with true creativity or understanding larger complexities. So what will Microsoft and companies like it sacrifice by moving so decisively toward automation? And will it ultimately harm their own innovation capacity?

We're standing at the threshold of a significant transformation—not just in management structures or P&L statements—but in how society values human work versus machine efficiency. Microsoft's gambit isn't just a business decision; it's a new blueprint for labor's role in the AI age.

This is AI Daily, I'm Harry Kermode.

Microsoft's Layoffs Mark AI-Driven Shift from Human to Machine Labor

Today in AI - 5-16-25

Unlock the secrets of data mastery with Shailendra, a 27-year veteran in AI, ML, and Data Science, driving AU$ 6 Billion in transformative value. As the author of 'Making Money out of Data,' their strategies redefine digital success. With expertise honed at IBM and Accenture, they drive innovation and data monetization. Explore how loyalty programs like Flybuys and Everyday Rewards revolutionize business—connect with Shaily today.

The Downtime is your weekly podcast for manufacturing news, hosted by Sarah Wynn and Sheri Kasprzak from WTWH Media. Thanks for spending your downtime with us!

Tune in for lively, insightful discussion of topics important to the mainframe community, from DevOps to security and staffing. 2020 & 2024 winner of the DevOps Dozen Award for Best DevOps-Related Podcast Series.

New tracks tagged #automation