What are the ingredients of a good conversation? Does it require a balance between conversational givers and takers or is it simply down to taking an interest in what your interlocutor is saying?

In this week’s podcast, we discuss conversations. We debate whether there is an optimal way to conduct a conversation and put forward a series of explanations based on our own idiosyncratic approaches. We discuss sideways conversations, the rationalist movement and share some of our most memorable conversations.

A few things we mentioned in this podcast:

- LessWrong: Conversations https://www.lesswrong.com/tag/conversation-topic
- Good conversations have lots of doorknobs https://experimentalhistory.substack.com/p/good-conversations-have-lots-of-doorknobs 
- Do conversations end when people want them to? https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2011809118
- Michael Parkinson interviews Meg Ryan https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blpq-Iwu25s

For more information on Aleph Insights visit our website https://alephinsights.com or to get in touch about our podcast email podcast@alephinsights.com

Image: Alan Warren via Wikimedia Commons

The Art Of Conversation

Chris, Nick and Fraser explore why the humbling of important public figures is particularly satisfying.

Political Schadenfreude

Welcome to the Cognitive Engineering podcast. Occasionally coherent musings of Aleph Insights. We hope you like listening to them as much as we like recording them.

The Art Of Conversation

Cognitive Engineering

Related tracks